Prysmian's decision to walk away from its planned submarine cables factory at Brayton Point is disappointing and discouraging.
commonwealthbeacon.org/energy/days-...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 4
Jake Auchincloss
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 499
Yes41%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jake Auchincloss
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 4
SoupScore
Jake's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 83 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Supreme Court has upheld the TikTok divestment law.
Now, Congress must ensure that Trump enforces it.
The Chinese Communist Party cannot be allowed to control the most influential media platform in America.
www.youtube.com/shorts/gqCYI...
This week, the House voted to approve a deal to end double taxation on Taiwanese investment in the United States. This is a vote for good jobs and to strengthen an important alliance. The Senate should follow suit.
youtu.be/_Z02RI65HSM
As a dad, I am outmatched by the tech executives who get richer each minute my children spend staring at a screen. But as a member of the congressional committee with jurisdiction over social media, I am fighting back hard.
I am excited to work with Members on both sides of the aisle to pass impactful legislation.
I will be serving on the Health, Energy, and Environment subcommittees on the House Committee on Energy & Commerce. These subcommittees have jurisdiction over a range of issues critical to Bay Staters, from drug-pricing to clean energy to PFAS remediation.
SLB will be violating U.S. law if it continues to provide oilfield services to Russia.
auchincloss.house.gov/news/in-the-...
Congratulations to the winner, Sophia Evans of Norfolk, who built an app that allows users to post and find environmental clean-up events in their neighborhood. Clean coding and a wonderful way to improve our towns and meet our neighbors.
The next generation knows that Web 2.0's version of social media, which foments tribalism, does not need to remain the status quo. Seeing students build better on the same day that TikTok lost oral arguments at the Supreme Court felt like an inflection point to me.
I was heartened this year to see many of the apps focus on building community, including one that brokered civil discourse on political issues and another that coached young people on how to socialize better.
Every year, middle and high schoolers can submit apps to the Congressional App Challenge. We hosted the students & their parents at the Newton district office to see demos and announce the winner.
Today's Federal Trade Commission report must galvanize Congress to finally end the abuses of drug-pricing middlemen.
Specialty steering is a one-two punch of price-gouging and self-dealing in which pharmacy benefit managers mark-up the price of generic medicines and then steer the reimbursement towards affiliated pharmacies. It raises premiums for everybody. youtube.com/shorts/18jjf...
My statement on H.R. 28, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.
With tighter restrictions finally in place, Congress must keep up the pressure on Trump to insist that India respect the sanctions and stop funding the war in Ukraine through its oil imports.
For three years, I have been pressing for tougher oil sanctions on Russia, including by leading bipartisan pressure on India to stop importing Russian oil.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
I wish Trump were as tough on Putin as he is on Panama.
youtu.be/pDyZcLILXrE
I didn’t co-lead the TikTok bill just as a Member of the China Select Committee. I am also one of the youngest parents in Congress. I’m in a race to rein in these social media corporations from attention-fracking our kids.
youtu.be/KtK9KzNsryg
Justice Jackson ftw – TikTok can continue to operate, it just can't let its algorithm answer to the Chinese Communist Party.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History499 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
499 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.