Meet Renee from Milwaukee. 👋
Renee is a stage-4 metastatic breast cancer patient who gets her lifesaving treatments through Medicaid. She will be my guest for President Trump's Joint Address tonight and she is here to say to Republicans: Don’t cut Medicaid.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk mass firing Social Security staff and shuttering field offices will only mean delays in getting benefits or seniors just not getting the benefits they are owed — and all this to make room for tax breaks for the rich.
The richest man in the world and Donald Trump are ripping the rug out from our Veterans and forcing the staff that care for our heroes out the door. This does NOT live up to our responsibility to take care of those who served us.
Linda McMahon is all on board to shut down the Department of Education, threatening to gut funding for our schools, teachers, and kids.
Folks, she should be nowhere near the Department of Education — let alone lead it.
Trump and Elon Musk are firing veterans and the VA workers who make sure our vets get the support they’ve earned.
I mean honestly, this is as low as it gets.
Republicans just took their first step to give a massive tax break for the richest of the rich – paid for by slashing Medicaid, ripping health care from kids and seniors, and gutting food assistance for families.
I stand with Wisconsin families. We're going to fight back.
Cutting public education. That’s where we’re heading. This administration seems poised to demolish the Department of Education but make no mistake, there will be lasting consequences and devastating impacts on millions of students and public-school teachers.
Republicans want tax cuts for the wealthy while working families struggle. That’s their plan.
I won’t sit idly by and let seniors, children, and veterans have their health care ripped away.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/2...
This past week, I voted to stop Americans’ health care from being ripped away.
Republicans voted to pad the pockets of billionaires. spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/central-...
Cutting mental health support? C’mon.
The 988 hotline saves lives and it is simply wrong for the Trump Administration to be putting it all at risk. www.cbsnews.com/news/samhsa-...
Elon Musk and Donald Trump are grinding lifesaving research into diseases like cancer to a halt — all so they can fund a tax break for themselves and their wealthy friends. This puts cures to diseases further away and I’ll fight back every way I can.
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/21/s...
Medicaid is a lifeline for 72 million Americans — putting health care within reach for the elderly, Americans with disabilities, and children.
Last night, Republicans refused to protect Medicaid and moved one step closer to slashing its funding.
Republicans just shot down my amendment to ensure we don’t cut Medicaid and kick millions of seniors off of their healthcare.
Republicans say they aren’t cutting Medicaid, but their budget plan says otherwise.
Tonight, the rubber meets the road. Will they cut Medicaid to fund their tax breaks for the wealthy, or stand with working families?
I know where I stand. www.foxnews.com/politics/exc...
Ripping away health care from our most vulnerable families to fund tax breaks for their ultra-wealthy friends is not what the American people want.
I have some questions for my colleagues and the American people deserve answers.
🚨ATTENTION! 🚨If you or someone you know is on Medicaid, you might want to tune into my press conference. STARTING SOON 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
www.youtube.com/live/JRsKg5p...
Today, the President endorsed BIG cuts to Medicaid and I’m fighting back. I won’t let seniors, veterans, children and SO many more have their health care ripped away.
We need to give working families some breathing room. My bill would do just that – taking on big drug companies and lowering the out-of-pocket costs of their prescription drugs.
Families want lower health care costs and that’s what I’m fighting for.
Eggs have reached $8/dozen.
Families are squeezed at the checkout counter.
Farmers and ranchers are hurting.
The Trump administration needs to act fast to get this avian flu crisis under control.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/2...
Families are scraping by to afford their lifesaving medications while big drug companies are raking in billions of dollars in profits. I’ve been fighting to bring down costs for families and my bill would do that by capping the price of prescription drugs.
www.weau.com/2025/02/14/s...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | PRESENT | NO | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | PRESENT | NO | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.