Julia Brownley headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 26
Born
August 28, 1952
Age 73
Phone
(202) 225-5811
Office
2262 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 26

Julia Brownley

Voting Record — 614
Yes42%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 26

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Julia Brownley headshot
Julia Brownley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 26
SoupScore
Julia's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 284 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Donald Trump has offered no credible objective, no defined timeline, and no serious plan to prevent further escalation. Military force cannot substitute for principled American leadership, sustained diplomacy, and a clear strategy to prevent a wider conflict in the Middle East.
The American people have opposed this reckless conflict from the start, and they should not be forced to bear the human, economic, and national security consequences of a war driven by political grievance and impulsive decision-making rather than strategy or diplomacy.
This is blatant racism and misogyny that elevates mediocrity at the expense of meritocracy. These servicemembers earned their ranks through service and sacrifice, and they deserve to be recognized and respected for their leadership.
It is deeply offensive that one of the most unqualified Defense Secretaries in modern history feels entitled to undermine military leadership decisions not based on readiness or performance, but because of political grievance and personal bias.
His relentless attacks on the military’s apolitical, merit-based promotion system are dangerous and fundamentally un-American. Hegseth has fired, sidelined, marginalized, and effectively demoted accomplished women and servicemembers of color who have dedicated their careers to defending our country.
Seniors, people with disabilities, and their caregivers should not be forced to pay the price for a decision that will increase costs, weaken care, and make it harder for vulnerable Californians to remain in their homes and communities.
Home-based care is not only the right thing to do, it is also more cost-effective than institutional care. These cuts are not about fiscal responsibility. They shift costs onto families, undermine access to care, and threaten the health and well-being of some of our most vulnerable neighbors.
There is nothing wasteful about helping seniors and people with disabilities remain safely and independently in their own homes, yet the administration has cut more than $1 billion in Medicaid funding that supports that very care.
The Trump administration has repeatedly invoked “waste, fraud, and abuse” to justify cuts to programs that help people meet their basic needs. This latest attack on California’s In-Home Supportive Services program is no different.
Trump and his cronies have proven time and again that they care little about keeping our communities safe or making life more affordable for working families. Instead, they remain fixated on rewarding their political allies and enriching themselves at taxpayers’ expense.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
614 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-06-04H. Res. 1336 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-06-04H. Res. 1336 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-06-04H. Con. Res. 84 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-06-03H. Res. 518 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H.R. 7726 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-06-03H.R. 7726 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-06-03H.R. 2860 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H. Res. 1333 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-06-03H. Res. 1333 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-06-03S. 254 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-06-03H.R. 7618 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-21H.R. 6047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-21H.R. 1041 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-21H.R. 1041 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-21H.R. 1329 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-05-21H.R. 1329 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-20H. Res. 1300 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-05-20H. Res. 1300 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-05-20H.R. 2616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-20H.R. 2616 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-20H.R. 1993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-20S. 1003 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-20S. 2393 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-20H.R. 5317 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-20H.R. 4544 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-20H.R. 3234 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-20H. Res. 1299 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-15H.R. 8469 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-15H.R. 8469 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 8365 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-14H.R. 8365 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 5625 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-14H. Con. Res. 75 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 6260 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-14H.R. 6260 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1259 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1251 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Con. Res. 96 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-05-13H.R. 1346 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-05-13H.R. 1346 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1252 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1274 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1274 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1275 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1275 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2853 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2071 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30S. 4465 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 13Next →