Donald Trump has offered no credible objective, no defined timeline, and no serious plan to prevent further escalation. Military force cannot substitute for principled American leadership, sustained diplomacy, and a clear strategy to prevent a wider conflict in the Middle East.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 26
Julia Brownley
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 614
Yes42%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 26
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Julia Brownley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 26
SoupScore
Julia's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 284 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The American people have opposed this reckless conflict from the start, and they should not be forced to bear the human, economic, and national security consequences of a war driven by political grievance and impulsive decision-making rather than strategy or diplomacy.
Today, after weeks of unnecessary delay, the House finally passed this urgent resolution to reassert Congress’s constitutional authority and push back against Trump’s unlawful escalation toward a broader regional war.
From the very beginning of this conflict, Democrats have fought to advance a War Powers Resolution to end Donald Trump’s unauthorized and reckless war in Iran.
We must restore integrity, fairness, and professionalism at the Department of Defense and reject this dangerous effort to turn our military into a partisan instrument of Donald Trump’s agenda.
This is blatant racism and misogyny that elevates mediocrity at the expense of meritocracy. These servicemembers earned their ranks through service and sacrifice, and they deserve to be recognized and respected for their leadership.
It is deeply offensive that one of the most unqualified Defense Secretaries in modern history feels entitled to undermine military leadership decisions not based on readiness or performance, but because of political grievance and personal bias.
His relentless attacks on the military’s apolitical, merit-based promotion system are dangerous and fundamentally un-American. Hegseth has fired, sidelined, marginalized, and effectively demoted accomplished women and servicemembers of color who have dedicated their careers to defending our country.
Instead of providing the steady leadership and reassurance our troops deserve during an active conflict, Pete Hegseth has chosen to wage a political and ideological war inside the Department of Defense.
Today and every day, I am proud to stand with LGBTQ+ individuals and families throughout Ventura County and across the country.
As we celebrate the progress we have made toward equality, we must also continue working to build a more inclusive future where every person is valued, respected, and free to live openly and proudly as their true selves.
Pride Month is a celebration of authenticity, community, and resilience. It is a time to recognize the LGBTQ+ community and the countless ways LGBTQ+ people strengthen, enrich, and help shape our nation.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
Summer should mean road trips and camping weekends — not doing math at the pump.
Trump's war of choice is costing families an extra $128 a month to fill up the tank.
Seniors, people with disabilities, and their caregivers should not be forced to pay the price for a decision that will increase costs, weaken care, and make it harder for vulnerable Californians to remain in their homes and communities.
Home-based care is not only the right thing to do, it is also more cost-effective than institutional care. These cuts are not about fiscal responsibility. They shift costs onto families, undermine access to care, and threaten the health and well-being of some of our most vulnerable neighbors.
More than 900,000 Californians depend on this program to stay out of nursing homes, and more than 500,000 caregivers help make that independence possible.
There is nothing wasteful about helping seniors and people with disabilities remain safely and independently in their own homes, yet the administration has cut more than $1 billion in Medicaid funding that supports that very care.
The Trump administration has repeatedly invoked “waste, fraud, and abuse” to justify cuts to programs that help people meet their basic needs. This latest attack on California’s In-Home Supportive Services program is no different.
Trump and his cronies have proven time and again that they care little about keeping our communities safe or making life more affordable for working families. Instead, they remain fixated on rewarding their political allies and enriching themselves at taxpayers’ expense.
This is a brazen abuse of power that once again demonstrates Trump’s contempt for our democracy, his disregard for the rule of law, and his willingness to put political loyalty above public interest.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History614 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
614 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.