Jason Crow headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Colorado District 6
Born
March 15, 1979
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-7882
Office
1323 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Colorado District 6

Jason Crow

Jason Crow is an American politician, lawyer, and former U.S. Army officer serving since 2019 as the United States representative for Colorado's 6th congressional district. Crow is the first member of the Democratic Party to represent the district including most of the inner eastern and southern suburbs of Denver, including Aurora, Littleton, Centennial and a portion of Denver.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 568
Yes43%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 6

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jason Crow headshot
Jason Crow
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratColorado District 6
SoupScore
Jason's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 31 sponsored · 75 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Supporting Ukraine isn’t just charity. It’s in America’s economic and security interests. A strong Ukraine helps keep food prices low, promotes trade & strong partnerships, and protects American troops in Europe.
Pete Hegseth skipped a defense leaders meeting at NATO headquarters. Our Defense Secretary should focus on doing his job, not his make-up room or renaming ships.
12/ Local law enforcement is responsible for maintaining order and preventing violence; Trump’s unnecessary use of military risks escalation and eroding trust in our military. And let’s be honest, Trump is also trying to intimidate Americans and suppress opposing views.
11/ The President’s order doesn’t even mention California, and authorizes the use of ANY personnel, in ANY location, for ANY length of time. This is a dangerous slippery slope that should concern Americans everywhere. If Trump is allowed to do this, any future president could as well.
10/ Not only does this deployment not meet the legal criteria for California, Trump’s Executive Order is expansive and open-ended, allowing it to be used across the country.
9/ Applying the law to the facts in California: -No invasion from a foreign nation. -No rebellion against the U.S. government. -No local law enforcement has said they’re unable to enforce the law.
8/ The President can call National Guard troops into Federal service when (10 USC 12406): -Invasion by a foreign nation. -Rebellion against our government. -Local law enforcement is unable to enforce the law.
7/ In 1970, four protesting students were killed by the National Guard at Kent State University. Many Americans remember this as one of the most egregious examples of abuse of power. Bottom line: these incidents not only resulted in deaths but also eroded trust in our military.
5/ In 1932, the Army was used to clear out a protest encampment of veterans seeking benefits. It ended in violence and damaged the reputation of the Army.
4/ Sending military personnel with combat equipment and heavy weapons into tense domestic situations rarely deescalates. We have often seen deadly consequences and the erosion of public trust.
3/ Our military is highly skilled, but receives very little training in law enforcement and domestic disturbance. Military forces are trained and organized for high-intensity combat operations.
2/ During my time in the military, I served in both National Guard and elite active-duty units (Rangers/paratroopers). I understand the training, authorities, and capabilities of military units.
As technology advances, we must do more to protect Americans' sensitive data. That’s why I’m introducing bipartisan, bicameral legislation to strengthen our defenses and protect families from cyberattackers.
The recent attack in Boulder is horrifying. I voted to condemn this violence and rise in antisemitism across America. The entire House joined together to speak in one unified voice. The vote was 400-0. Nobody should have to live in fear because of their beliefs or who they are.
I’m a Democrat because we’re the party of the working class. Americans don’t want government to fix all their problems for them. They just want a fair shake and an opportunity to succeed.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
568 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournNONOPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 12Next →