
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 31
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 552
Yes43%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 31
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 31
SoupScore
Gilbert Ray's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Social Security is an earned benefit. But Elon Musk's DOGE has made it harder for our seniors and the disabled to live in dignity. He's turning people away from SSA offices in the name of "efficiency." www.latimes.com/world-nation...
Trump's budget would extend tax breaks for corporations and the top 0.1%. And we know what happened last time Trump jammed through his tax priorities -- corporations enriched themselves rather than lower prices on essential goods for everyday Americans. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
If Washington Republicans were actually concerned about gutting $880B from Medicaid and jeopardizing the healthcare of millions of Americans, they wouldn't try to jam through Trump's disastrous budget. This is nothing more than lip service. www.notus.org/congress/hou...
The City of West Covina is hosting a series of community workshops to provide engagement opportunities for its Parks and Recreation Master Plan. They are an excellent opportunity to share your ideas on the future of our city’s parks and recreational facilities.
Gun violence is the leading cause of death for children and teens in America. But instead of standing up for public safety, President Trump has given the green light for reckless gun dealers to sell firearms to criminals. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/07/u...
Semiconductors are in everything from phones, to computers, to cars and until the Biden Administration's CHIPS and Science Act, the US was at a major manufacturing disadvantage. Trump's tariffs are not only raising prices, they're shipping these critical jobs overseas. www.wired.com/story/trump-...
President Trump's tariffs will cost American households between $4,000 to $8,000. On everything from food, to electronics, to even diapers and baby gear, Trump is raising costs and taking aim at Americans' own pocketbooks.
abcnews.go.com/GMA/Family/t...
Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield is a three star officer and was the first woman to lead the Naval War College. I continue to have grave concerns with the President's purge of national security officials based on perceived loyalty, rather than competency. www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...
Even House Republicans admit their budget is based on junk math. And they still insist on lying about their cuts to Medicaid and Social Security. www.notus.org/congress/rep...
40 years of "trickle-down" economics have created record levels of income inequality. Enough is enough. This #AANHPIEqualPay day, we need leaders across business, education, and politics to stand with us in order to help us achieve livable, equitable wages.
American jobs are already at risk because of the President's ill-thought out tariffs. He's making it more expensive both to build cars domestically and to import them, which directly undercuts any attempts to bolster US automobile manufacturing. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
And Secretary Hegseth isn't just targeting books. He's using DEI as an excuse to pause sexual assault and sexual harassment prevention and response programs at the DoD. He's actively creating a dangerous environment.
I joined Victor Blackwell and CNN this morning to discuss the Naval Academy's purge of 400 books because of the Trump Administration's crusade against DEI. This is not how we create better students and better servicemembers.
Senate Republicans are going to use junk math to gut Medicaid and Social Security and justify tax breaks for Elon Musk and billionaires. It's despicable that they would put the health and dignity of everyday Americans on the chopping block. www.notus.org/congress/rep...
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
“We have grave concerns about the firing of General Haugh and Deputy Director Noble. ... Yet again, the president is telling the country that ... Fealty to Trump is the only job requirement, no matter how serious the implications are for our nat sec. Our country is less safe because of his actions.”
This is a massive disservice to Naval Academy students, all in the name of Secretary Hegseth's bigoted campaign against DEI. Promoting diversity of thought is what strengthens and sharpens our students and servicemembers. www.washingtonpost.com/education/20...
This is not the treatment our fallen servicemembers deserve. But as usual, the occupant of the White House is choosing the wealthy over the American people. It's especially disgraceful that he's doing this to Gold Star families.
I welcome the acting Inspector General of the DoD's investigation, but this doesn't excuse Secretary Hegseth or Michael Waltz from appearing before HASC and answering for their reckless attitude towards our national security. www.cnn.com/2025/04/03/p...
How are tariffs on US servicemembers and penguins going to help our economy? More evidence that President Trump put no thought behind his disastrous tariffs. www.cnn.com/2025/04/03/b...
It's incomprehensible that a social media influencer and conspiracy-theorist is advising the President on national security decisions. This Administration continues to value blind loyalty over competency. www.cnn.com/2025/04/03/p...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History552 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
552 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.