These contractors receive massive amounts of public money from the American people—and too often gouge the public and fail to deliver what our military needs.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17
Christopher R. Deluzio
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 614
Yes45%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Pentagon's own data on this is clear: defense contractors have shrunk the share of revenue spent on research & development, while jacking up their own stock buybacks.
Last night, big defense contractors successfully lobbied members of Congress to kill my NDAA amendment that would’ve blocked them from buying back their own stock.
From a reckless foreign war to record inflation, our servicemembers and their families are carrying heavy burdens right now—they should not be worrying about going hungry.
A government of, by, and for... the biggest corporations and polluters in the country.
It’s not enough to just be against Donald Trump—we have to be bold in taking on the corrupt and powerful that have wrecked the American Dream.
Great conversation this week with @reprabb.bsky.social & @perrybaconjr.bsky.social about the urgency for Democrats to break the corrupt power that has long dominated Washington.
Four years ago this week, six Supreme Court justices overturned Roe v. Wade and took away a fundamental American freedom from millions of women. Today, right-wing politicians are working overtime to further restrict abortion rights. Every American must be free to make their own healthcare decisions.
+ 13 dead US servicemembers and hundreds more wounded.
All 100% avoidable.
At home in PA, leaders like @ace-innamorato.bsky.social and @pasenatorsaval.com have been fighting for years for Whole Home Repair to lower housing costs and create jobs.
The President is blocking common-sense solutions like this from going to the whole country.
Our pressure is working. We’re standing together—veterans and the VA workers who care for veterans—against fiscally reckless and morally bankrupt cuts for those who have served our country. We'll keep fighting to make sure this bill never sees the light of day 💪
Some good news down in Washington: Republicans have cancelled the vote on their latest bill to cut veterans benefits.
Reposted byCongressman Chris Deluzio
Republicans spend trillions on tax giveaways to the ultra rich, and billions a day for Trump's war with Iran. But when it comes to caring for our veterans suddenly we need "fiscal responsibility." The so called "Take Care of America's Veterans Act" does anything but.
Republicans are trying to cut veterans benefits again. This morning, I'm fighting back with my fellow veterans and labor leaders 👇
Republicans in Congress shouldn't break that promise. Forcing veterans to lose benefits in the name of "fiscal responsibility"—after the GOP just jacked up the debt by trillions for more tax giveaways to the ultra rich and powerful—is a joke.
America makes a sacred promise to our veterans: serve your country, then your country delivers the care and benefits you’ve earned and need.
Proud to join @bluegreenalliance.bsky.social today and fight for a stronger USMCA trade deal that protects American jobs and our environment 🇺🇸
Big Tech has had the power to stop this for years—it's time we stop hoping they’ll change and instead use our power to make them.
Today is Social Media Victims Remembrance Day. I'll never stop fighting for a world that's safe for our kids, where no family has to suffer unthinkable loss because of harms and abuses online.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History614 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
614 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-21 | H. Con. Res. 58 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 1949 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.