More than 120 children were killed more than 120 days ago—likely by a US missile—and we still have no answers from Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump. They never should have started this reckless war in the first place.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17
Christopher R. Deluzio
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 614
Yes45%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%

Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today, five Supreme Court justices upheld a core truth of our Constitution: Americans are Americans.
If you were born here, America is your home—no President can change that.
4 in 5 Americans say housing costs are “extremely or very important to them."
It’s time for the President to sign the housing bill—instead of blocking it so he can make it harder to vote for you and lying about election results.
These contractors receive massive amounts of public money from the American people—and too often gouge the public and fail to deliver what our military needs.
The Pentagon's own data on this is clear: defense contractors have shrunk the share of revenue spent on research & development, while jacking up their own stock buybacks.
Last night, big defense contractors successfully lobbied members of Congress to kill my NDAA amendment that would’ve blocked them from buying back their own stock.
From a reckless foreign war to record inflation, our servicemembers and their families are carrying heavy burdens right now—they should not be worrying about going hungry.
A government of, by, and for... the biggest corporations and polluters in the country.
It’s not enough to just be against Donald Trump—we have to be bold in taking on the corrupt and powerful that have wrecked the American Dream.
Great conversation this week with @reprabb.bsky.social & @perrybaconjr.bsky.social about the urgency for Democrats to break the corrupt power that has long dominated Washington.
Four years ago this week, six Supreme Court justices overturned Roe v. Wade and took away a fundamental American freedom from millions of women. Today, right-wing politicians are working overtime to further restrict abortion rights. Every American must be free to make their own healthcare decisions.
+ 13 dead US servicemembers and hundreds more wounded.
All 100% avoidable.
At home in PA, leaders like @ace-innamorato.bsky.social and @pasenatorsaval.com have been fighting for years for Whole Home Repair to lower housing costs and create jobs.
The President is blocking common-sense solutions like this from going to the whole country.
Our pressure is working. We’re standing together—veterans and the VA workers who care for veterans—against fiscally reckless and morally bankrupt cuts for those who have served our country. We'll keep fighting to make sure this bill never sees the light of day 💪
Some good news down in Washington: Republicans have cancelled the vote on their latest bill to cut veterans benefits.
Reposted byCongressman Chris Deluzio
Republicans spend trillions on tax giveaways to the ultra rich, and billions a day for Trump's war with Iran. But when it comes to caring for our veterans suddenly we need "fiscal responsibility." The so called "Take Care of America's Veterans Act" does anything but.
Republicans are trying to cut veterans benefits again. This morning, I'm fighting back with my fellow veterans and labor leaders 👇
Republicans in Congress shouldn't break that promise. Forcing veterans to lose benefits in the name of "fiscal responsibility"—after the GOP just jacked up the debt by trillions for more tax giveaways to the ultra rich and powerful—is a joke.
America makes a sacred promise to our veterans: serve your country, then your country delivers the care and benefits you’ve earned and need.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History614 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
614 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.