From attacks on reproductive freedom to threats to Social Security, I’ll keep fighting the Musk Administration’s cruel cuts to the critical services our families rely on.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 30
Laura Friedman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 583
Yes42%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 30
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Laura Friedman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 30
SoupScore
Laura's ATmosphere Activity
17 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 67 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Excited to have been invited to join Californians in Orange County for an important town hall on women’s rights, democracy, and the challenges ahead.
Veteran suicide hotline staff shortages aren’t just ‘mishaps and mistakes,’ Speaker. Try again.
Veterans deserve better than a leader who abandons them the moment Trump yanks his leash.
We need real leadership that lowers costs, puts hardworking people first, and protects programs our children and seniors rely on — not more failed trickle-down economics.
Meanwhile, he’s gutting Social Security offices, attacking Medicaid, and making it harder for people to get the services they rely on. His policies aren’t about helping you — they’re about undermining the programs millions depend on.
Trump’s speech was exactly what we expected — spin, deflection, and no real solutions. But here’s today's reality: His tariffs are a new 25% tax on hardworking families, driving up prices on everything from food to electricity and making life more expensive for everyday Americans.
Together, we're demanding my colleagues stand with disaster survivors in California & across the country by unconditionally delivering life-saving aid.
I'm bringing Burbank Fire Fighters President Eric Rowley to the Joint Session of Congress.
Just like Eric and his fellow firefighters didn’t hesitate to answer the call, Congress cannot fail to act.
We need real solutions lowering costs, protecting Medicaid, and improving lives — not Trump’s cruel trickle-down policies that line the pockets of his billionaire buddies.
Tonight, Trump will spin his record but ignore the noise — his new tariffs are a tax on hardworking families, making everyday life more expensive, not better.
youtu.be/oDgfmvxGB24
Today, we celebrate the incredible talent that brings these stories to life — and I’m committed to fighting for the support they need to thrive.
Can’t wait for the #Oscars tonight! As a former producer, I’ve seen firsthand how this industry fuels creativity, drives our economy, and supports hundreds of thousands of jobs in California.
I was proud to stand in solidarity on the capital steps with House Democrats, who stand united against the GOP’s attack on hardworking people.
I’m a big fat “hell no” on the Republican Party’s upside-down budget.
What is it? A $4.5 trillion tax break for billionaires paid for by cutting Medicaid, SNAP food benefits, veterans programs, Head Start education for kids, & life-saving medical research to pad the wallets of their wealthy donors.
Aid is a right, not a bargaining chip. Congress must reject this reckless precedent—disaster relief should never be political.
After Hurricane Ian, Florida got $3.9 billion in federal disaster aid— no strings attached. Why should Californians be treated differently? We power the nation’s economy and are just asking for our tax dollars back.
The Trump admin wants to play politics with disaster relief. The reality is Californians give tens of billions more in federal taxes every year than any other state. We shouldn’t have to beg for help when we have residents who have lost everything. This is extortion, plain and simple.
← Newer postsPosts page 62
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History583 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
583 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 5625 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H. Con. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1259 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1251 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 96 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1252 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-12 | H.R. 2853 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-05-12 | H.R. 2071 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. 4465 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | S. 1318 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 227 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 7959 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-23 | H.R. 5587 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1182 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | S. 1020 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 2493 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 5201 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 5200 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 1681 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.