PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
BlueskyFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govApr 25(source)
Yosemite was a national park before we had national parks. It was the first land we set aside for public use and preservation. As @padilla.senate.gov says, national parks are our greatest idea and we must continue to advocate for investment and protection of these precious lands.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 24(source)
Stripping Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks of its protections would be a reckless abuse of power and a slap in the face to countless New Mexicans. We have a moral responsibility to future generations that supersedes any ultra wealthy executive’s desire to line their pockets.
Trump officials consider shrinking 6 national monuments in the West
Interior Department officials are considering scaling back the boundaries of national monuments in the West to encourage energy development on public lands.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 24(source)
“Simply put, our town cannot survive without gross receipts tax,” said Silver City Councilor Guadalupe Cano. “We don’t get gross receipts tax unless we get visitors here. Visitors come here for the Gila.” More in Albuquerque Journal ⬇️
New Mexico senator, congressman want more river protections
A new bill from Rep. Gabe Vasquez and Sen. Martin Heinrich would create more protection for the Gila River, the only free flowing river in New Mexico.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 23(source)
The existing Continental Divide National Scenic Trail serves as a major economic driver for communities along the trail and provides recreational access to incredible landscapes. My bill will finally finish incomplete portions of the trail and make it easier and safer to access.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 23(source)
Last week, I met with veterans and advocates at the Veteran Integration Center in Albuquerque about how the DOGE chaos threatens veterans and veterans’ services. We owe our nation’s heroes more than gratitude, we owe them action and the quality of care they were promised.
Senator Martin Heinrich sits at a table with veterans and advocates at the Veteran Integration Center in Albuquerque.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 22(source)
From higher home insurance rates to skyrocketing utility bills, we’re already feeling the cost of climate inaction. @schatz.bsky.social's Climate Change Financial Risk Act will help us make local economies more resilient for families, workers, and small businesses.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 22(source)
Agricultural producers and rural communities rely on the health of our land and water. That's why I’m reintroducing my Agriculture Resilience Act. It sets a national goal of net-zero emissions in agriculture by 2040 through farmer-led, science-based initiatives.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 22(source)
New Mexico's national monuments are a balance of public land protections negotiated between local leaders, communities, and Tribes. They're treasured places that support a robust outdoor recreation economy. We strongly urge Secretary Burgum to leave our national monuments alone.
Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govApr 21(source)
It’s National Park Week! DYK: In 2019, @heinrich.senate.gov helped designate White Sands a national park? It’s one of his favorite places to go–and with entrance fees at all our national parks waived this week, it’s a great time to check it out for yourself.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 21(source)
In New Mexico, the Rio Chama, the Jemez, the Rio Grande, and the Pecos all benefit from the protections of Wild and Scenic designation. The Gila and San Francisco Rivers deserve no less. I've introduced legislation to make sure these watersheds get the lasting protections they deserve.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 17(source)
Yesterday morning, I joined a group of students in Albuquerque to discuss our work to reduce gun violence & save lives. One day later and another community is reeling from the devastation of gun violence. We need action. Now.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 17(source)
There is nothing more rewarding than serving others. AmeriCorps taught me that. AmeriCorps members and volunteers respond to natural disasters, protect our wildlife, and contribute to communities all across our country. It’s a service we should be building on instead of cutting.
AP Headline: AmeriCorps members who respond to disasters and help nonprofits are let go in DOGE cuts
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 17(source)
Medicaid covers more than 780,000 people in New Mexico. If Republicans get their way and cut one third of Medicaid’s funding, that means: • 83,000 rural residents lose health coverage • 95,000 children lose health insurance • More than 1 in 5 seniors lose nursing home care
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 17(source)
What this administration is doing to public education is a disservice to our kids and our teachers. The White House wants us to give up, but I'll never do that. Today I spoke with educators in Rio Rancho and I’ll continue to hear from and fight for people in the trenches.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 16(source)
Thank you to New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence, @everytown.bsky.social, @momsdemand.bsky.social, and @studentsdemand.bsky.social for joining me today and talking about how GOSAFE can help us save real lives.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 15(source)
Today, @fernandez.house.gov and I met with Pecos community leaders to discuss our Pecos Watershed Protection Act. Pecos deserves clean water free from harmful mining pollution and we’ll continue to push for permanent protections to protect the Pecos River.
Senator Martin Heinrich and Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez meet with Pecos community leaders.
Senator Martin Heinrich shakes hands with local community leader.
Senator Martin Heinrich and Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez meet with Pecos community leaders over breakfast.
Senator Martin Heinrich and Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez meet with Pecos community leaders.
← Newer postsPosts page 34Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05—Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 26 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26YESNO✕Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 33 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33YESNO✕Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02S.J. Res. 37 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionYESNO✕↔Joint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationYESNO✕↔Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 18Next →