Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 181 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

If Trump were actually the strong-man he pretends to be, he'd tell Netanyahu to allow the food to flow, so innocent Palestinian children don't die of starvation. Talking about how sad this is in between rounds at his golf course in Scotland is weak beyond words.   Feed Gaza.
I've been in touch with Mayor Carter and am monitoring the situation in St. Paul. A coordinated, malicious attack on one of Minnesota’s biggest cities is disruptive, but I’m grateful to Governor Walz and Mayor Carter for their leadership, and to all the experts working to get to the bottom of this.
Headline from the Star Tribune: Major cyberattack hits St. Paul, shuts down many services
Years of painstaking work finally paid off. Democrats and Republicans alike agreed that we need to address the housing crisis in this country. Next stop: Senate floor.
Tweet from @rcobooth: the Senate's big housing package just moved unanimously out of the banking committee
Reposted byTina Smith
24 million women rely on Medicaid to access basic health care. Routine physicals, maternal and postpartum care, birth control, childbirth, cancer screenings. Republicans have sacrificed their health to make a handful of billionaires richer.
Food and water should never be politicized. Netanyahu's disregard for civilian life is appalling. The near-total blockade of food and aid into Gaza must end – innocent children are being starved.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (81-15)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (15-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (44-51)
2025-08-01Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114)NONOMotion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-01End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (55-41)
2025-07-31End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-07-31End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-41)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-38)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 34 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (24-73)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 41 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (27-70)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 16Next →