AGAIN: There is no way to get the massive billionaire tax cuts they want and cut $1.5 trillion from the budget without taking away people’s health care.
Basic math.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 788
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The admin’s top trade guy denied that this was a trade war.
But if you’re tariffing EVERY country using an arbitrary, poorly written formula that makes no economic sense and just causes pain... and countries are promising to retaliate… that’s a trade war.
They’re essentially telling everyone "Shut up, fall in line, and we’ll help you take people’s health care."
There is no way to cut $1.5 trillion from the budget while giving tax breaks to billionaires without taking away people’s health care.
Reposted byTina Smith
U.S. Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota has introduced legislation to permanently ban mining for copper, nickel and precious metals over about 350 square miles within the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.
Reposted byTina Smith
Sen. Tina Smith has introduced a bill that would permanently protect the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness from sulfide mining.
I’m not going to cave on tariffs!
But also these are a negotiation!
But also these are permanent!
We need these tariffs now!
But also I will pause them and maybe turn them back on!
Not exactly adding the certainty that businesses rely on.
Glad he caved but seriously, get your ducks in a row.
Businesses don’t want to deal with a country that turns tariffs on and off like a light switch.
Reposted byTina Smith
BIG NEWS: Sen. Tina Smith has introduced a bill in the Senate that would permanently protect the Boundary Waters from the threat of toxic copper mining. It's been 50 years since BWCA legislation was introduced in the Senate.
Thank @smith.senate.gov now:
www.savetheboundarywaters.org/SmithBill
We need to fight with every tool we have to protect the Boundary Waters, one of America’s greatest wilderness areas.
That’s why I’m introducing the Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection Act.
Announcement coming soon… 👀
If you or someone you know needs help, call the Sexual Assault and Harassment hotline at 800-656-HOPE (4673).
April is National Sexual Assault Awareness Month, and there’s a lot more we need to do to support survivors. Things like helping victims access proper care, ending the stigma and ensuring survivors have opportunities to seek justice.
America might be the seventh thing he bankrupts with the way he’s running things.
Reposted byTina Smith
The president has now visited his golf courses on at least 24 days since Inauguration Day — nearly one-third of the 76 days he’s been in office. He went four straight days after “Liberation Day.”
He’s also spent more than 105 hours at his courses since February.
Graphic with @sadbumblebee.buzz
Reposted byTina Smith
I followed Trump to his golf courses as he putted and the markets burned.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History788 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
788 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.