Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We should be empowering local communities to solve their housing challenges in ways that work best for them. My bill with @aoc.bsky.social, the Homes Act, would do that.
At the heart of this is one simple goal: making sure everyone can build a life they can afford and be proud of.
Housing costs are one of the biggest challenges people face. Rent is rising, buying a home feels out of reach, and the lack of affordable housing makes it harder for people to build the lives they want.
We need housing solutions that put people first.
Always great to catch up with Congresswoman Craig. Looking forward to another term working together to deliver for small towns, rural places, farmers and ranchers.
… and as always: Go Lynx!
That's why I joined the Senate Finance Committee. To fight for reforms that tangibly benefit workers, rather than the mythical promises of trickle down that never seem to materialize.
Americans didn't vote for more tax breaks for billionaires. They voted because their lives cost too much.
We see time and time again that the 2017 Trump tax law benefitted those at the very top while leaving working families with little benefit.
I'm grateful for the opportunity and I look forward to using my voice on this Committee to continue fighting for all of Minnesota – families, small businesses, farmers, rural parts – so that everyone can build the life they want.
Parts of the 2017 tax law are set to expire. Re-writing them will be one of the biggest fights, and it starts in the Finance Committee.
We need a better tax code for American workers (who were forced to foot the bill for big corporate giveaways for the ultra-wealthy last time).
I’m joining the Senate Finance Committee.
I’m excited to continue standing up for Minnesotans and the issues we care about. This new post presents a unique opportunity to protect Medicare + Social Security, expand mental health access, and write a fairer tax code.
Tragic news out of New Orleans about this terrible act of terrorism against innocent people simply out to celebrate New Year’s Eve.
We are all thinking about New Orleans today.
Happy New Year, Minnesota!
We have a big year ahead of us, but Archie and I hope you can take some time to reflect and celebrate the New Year with your loved ones 🎉
Jimmy Carter personified moral leadership for our country and the world. I was blessed to meet him several times. My favorite moment (when this pic was taken), he had just finished an energetic conversation w/ Archie about the virtues of fly fishing.
May his memory be a blessing.
She was smart and funny and dedicated to public service. Everything was better when Kari was involved.
I’m so sad to hear we have lost MN State Senator Kari Dziedzic to cancer, gone too soon at 62.
Kari was a friend and ally for 20 years, dating back to our staff days when I worked for Mayor Rybak at City Hall and she worked for the County Board.
Habari Gani, Minnesota! Archie and I wish you all a joyous Kwanzaa.
Minnesota lost a fierce fighter for the North Country with the passing of Mary Murphy.
Mary was the longest serving woman in the MN legislature, serving for 46 years. I counted her a friend & advisor for many years, with her strong opinions, curly white hair and tomato red coat.
We will miss her.
Happy Hanukkah, Minnesota! Wishing everyone celebrating the festival of lights a wonderful eight days filled with loved ones, latkes and joy.
Archie and I are wishing everyone in Minnesota and across the country a Merry Christmas! Hope everyone can have a wonderful and peaceful day with your loved ones 🎄
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.