Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

huh. would love to know what's happening on Duck Duck Go's image search for this very specific error to be so firmly embedded
With the vast array of cures, treatments, power dampeners and the like now available across the marvel universe it is frankly irresponsible that the x-men insist on what is essentially a second amendment right to own nuclear weapons provided you’re born with them
What's an opinion about X-Men that'll get you sent to jail? Is Jean really interesting or really boring? Should Logan have stayed dead? Do you think a certain x-mens outfit is positively horrendous even though people seem to love it? The Brood Saga is better than Dark Phoenix imo 🤷
Yup, agree again, the government has sucked at actually backing Yimby policies. I will say — I would be very happy if it did pro-development policies that were effective enough that the migration policy started to bite, but that's just not a concern I have right now.
Yeah — but there's lots of building and construction that isn't "planning" or "immigration" and I think if there's a criticism of Labour Yimby it's more that "they don't care about labour shortages" than "they only care about planning"
Yeah sorry — I mean the BSR as a subset of planning. If you mean strictly and literally just planning, then I think you're doing the Yimbys down. The focus is much more broadly "the government and how it interacts with development"
I am annoyed by how much of this episode involved me wishcasting for how Digital ID could work if the government were competent, strategic, thoughtful or politically savvy. It shouldn't be my job to go "here is the left-wing case for digital ID", it should be Keir Starmer's!
Labour want to bring in digital I.D. and many people do NOT like it. Are they right? Are they wrong? And what is the “Lethal Trifecta” that makes the plan so risky? @hannahfearn.bsky.social, @jonnelledge.bsky.social, @hern.bsky.social and @mattgreencomedy.com discuss 👉 linktr.ee/ohgodwhatnow...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferNONOFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionNONOFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 12Next →