Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Looks like this is a bug but not the bug you'd think. I don't have "depth effect" turned on, so this shouldn't happen, so I had to turn Depth Effect on, then save, then turn it off, then save. But if I *had* had depth effect on, this would have been the intended behaviour
it cycles between kids, partner, nature and "cities", and yeah, I've been resisting screenshotting the many times it happened to the first two categories.
i've hit the point in Diamond Age where Neal Stephenson looks straight at the reader and says "do not build the Primer from the book The Diamond Age"
Labour would find it easy to campaign against this rank homophobia if they weren’t in the middle of enacting and enforcing a bathroom ban for trans people
Nigel Farage: "Children who have two stable parents have a better chance in life... The most stable relationships, the ones that last the longest, tend to be between men & women... There's an awful lot of kids in the country not getting the kind of start... they deserve." Farage has two ex-wives.
Sure but Tesla’s UK government contacts are tiny too. Twitter as a political cause is precisely why it needs to be the focus of any useful attempt to limit musk’s power in British politics
it's like going on Fox News to talk about how Rupert Murdoch is so bad you won't buy the Wall Street Journal any more, it's incoherent on the face of it
everyone wants to be nice and give ed davey credit for calling musk bad when the rest of the political leadership won't and I get it, but musk's badness is _intimately_ tied up in his ownership of Twitter — not Tesla — and if you don't acknowledge that, you're not really doing anything to help
this is getting silly lmao, you can't do this sort of campaigning while being an active twitter user
Lib Dem leader Davey: “The Government needs to block any future contracts with Tesla, and block Musk from being granted a license to supply energy to British homes “Ministers should make clear that if you are egging on violence on the streets of the UK, you are not someone we can do business with.”
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONOPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 12Next →