
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 6
Chrissy Houlahan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 535
Yes43%
No52%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align96%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 6
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Chrissy Houlahan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 6
SoupScore
Chrissy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 30 sponsored · 120 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Department of Education has frozen funds for PA teachers and schools. Money already allocated by Congress that schools are counting on never showed up in their bank accounts.
The Senate has the opportunity to stop this reckless waste by voting NO on the rescission package President Trump is trying to ram through.
I urge all Senators including the Commonwealth's @fetterman.senate.gov and @davemccormick.bsky.social to stand up for what is right and vote NO.
Americans didn't vote for setting their tax dollars on fire. But we're about to torch 500 tons of emergency food we have already paid for, meant to keep children alive.
That's why I support @moulton.house.gov NDAA amendment requiring a written report documenting performance concerns prior to the removal of an officer.
5) Female officers are being removed from their posts without cause or explanation, leading us to believe that they were relieved simply because they are women.
4) Affinity groups provide incredible opportunities for students. Targeting and disbanding select minority groups sends a chilling message that they aren't welcome in our service academies or in our military. I support @cisneros.house.gov amendment preventing DoD from eliminating these groups.
3) We absolutely have to protect funds intended to improve quality of life for servicemembers and their families, including housing and childcare. That's why I spoke in favor of @sarajacobs.house.gov amendment to the NDAA that would do exactly that.
That's why I support Rep. Eric Sorensen's amendment to exempt these positions from the DoD hiring freeze.
2) Anyone who has been in the military will tell you that our civilian workforce is essential to our success. Eliminating these jobs doesn't make us safer or more lethal. Nor does it eliminate waste, fraud or abuse.
If I breached security protocol like Secretary Hegseth while I was an officer in the Air Force, I would have resigned my post. I suggest he do the same.
1) I spoke in support of @sarajacobs.house.gov amendment to the NDAA that prohibits the Secretary of Defense from communicating about classified materials on nonsecure devices and apps including Signal.
🧵 On Amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act
HASC Democrats will work hard to ensure the bill reflects our national security needs, free from political nonsense.
Three: This process is long. We started today and probably won’t vote on the final passage until September. But my colleagues and I will be there every step of the way, fighting for our servicemembers and our military.
Two: The republicans are almost guaranteed to try and include amendments called "poison pills” that sneak their personal priorities into the bill. These are attention grabs and a distraction from the job we’re meant to do.
One: This bill authorizes every dollar of Pentagon spending and defense priorities. That includes everything from servicemember pay and military quality of life to shipbuilding, biosecurity, and beyond.
Today, I have been in committee markups for the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA. Here are three things you need to know:
That's why I support Rep. Sorensen's amendment to exempt these positions from the DoD hiring freeze.
Anyone who has been in the military will tell you that our civilian workforce is essential to our success. Eliminating these jobs doesn't make us safer or more lethal. Nor does it eliminate waste, fraud or abuse.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History535 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
535 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.