Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 535
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align92%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 69 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I like "Charles R." You feel it was signed by a very earnest third grader who has stoically accepted that there is always going to be another Charles in his class.
If there was an eight-episode behind-the-scenes docuseries about the making of a season of The Traitors, I cannot describe how quickly I would drop everything, including long-standing friendships if necessary, to watch it.
That was shocking and disillusioning, as was finding out that the murdered people learn they're murdered in the morning and are not dragged from their sleep in the middle of the night. (Which, yes, I should have known from the hair and makeup.)
This is full of wonderful Traitors detail--and it explains why the US show pretends the contestants sleep in the castle and the UK version doesn't. It's because the BBC has some weird, dangerous belief that you shouldn't lie to your viewers. Imagine! www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/20...
I think if you're hearing it now, 3 years early, what is really being said is "Don't pull some stunt if your preferred nominee loses and hand the election to the GOP." That seems inarguable to me, but also not worth arguing, since some people hate to hear it as much as other people love to say it.
Mamdani's win was a vindication of "Vote blue no matter who"! Tons of NYCers who didn't like Mamdani voted for him because he was the nominee. It's a good principle--fight for your candidate during the primaries, and then, if necessary, handle your disappointment and get in line.
It's Susan Collins morality--oh well, tut tut, cluck cluck, don't hate me because I'm dutiful. You see it in the new polls that show GOP voters having "no opinion" on tons of issues. I don't think Democrats should run on arguing that Trump voters are all complicit. It's not helpful. But it is true.
I am not going to step into a social-media conversation that brings out the absolute worst tendencies of both sides. But I will offer one useful piece of information: Masto and Fetterman are not up for reelection in November.
I find it really incredible that the concept of “vote blue no matter who” is so hard for some to grasp. It doesn’t mean “all Democrats are good.” It means “vote for the Democrat against the Republican.” In their November races, Fetterman, Masto, Platner, Booker, Newsom are the correct choices
I think that's very different from saying he just waited until he he believed a narrow majority of the public had his back; he was actually gently pulling a crucial segment of the public forward after having smoothed the way for them.
For me, and for many of his gay supporters, it was clear from the time of his first election that he supported same-sex marriage; what he did during his first term was build a narrative so that, at the right moment, he could get as many Americans as possible to cross that bridge with him.>
I think that what Obama did regarding marriage equality between 2009 and 2012 was actually much more complicated than this. As early as 2010, he said publicly that his position was "evolving"; he basically used himself as a model for other people who needed to be shown a way to rethink the issue.>
In 2008, Barack Obama’s job was to win a presidential election by pandering to public opinion. It was other people’s job to persuade the public that marriage equality was good, and he hopped on the bandwagon when it crossed 50%. That’s politics.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
535 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-15H.R. 8469 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-15H.R. 8469 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 8365 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-14H.R. 8365 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 5625 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-14H. Con. Res. 75 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 6260 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-14H.R. 6260 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1259 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1251 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Con. Res. 96 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H.R. 1346 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H.R. 1346 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1252 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1274 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1274 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1275 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1275 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2853 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2071 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30S. 4465 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-04-30S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-29S. 1318 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 227 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 7959 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-23H.R. 5587 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1182 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-21S. 1020 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 2493 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 5201 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 5200 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 11Next →