Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8
Mark Harris
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 567
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 73 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This is straight-up Nazi rhetoric from Musk, and the only tiny thing I can do is address myself to those of you who are still on X. No more excuses about how you need "reach" or how good the conversation is there or the importance of debate. You will not regret walking away, and it's time.
Is the country safer now?
Our story @chicagotribune.com: Chicago teen Ofelia Torres, whose father was detained by ICE while she fought cancer, dies. www.chicagotribune.com/2026/02/14/c...
Looking forward to seeing both!
Okay but here he is winning the Oscar for it.
I like watching them both now that they are solidly in their "Ask your doctor if ___ is right for you" years. The fifties are when male movie actors either decide to get more interesting or they panic and try to stay young. I think they are in general going in the right direction.
G-d did it.
I'm watching The Rip. Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are approximately the ages William Holden and Art Carney were when they made The Towering Inferno and Harry and Tonto.
It was so whiplashy! An hour of "Anyone can fall in love" followed by an hour of "Come spend time with us and let us demonstrate to you how stupid you are for wanting what you think you want."
NYCers: If you've never had occasion to be at the NYC Marriage Bureau when a bunch of couples are marrying, I recommend it with all my heart. It is one of the most joyous things imaginable and an instant reminder that the city is both unbelievably diverse and bursting with hope and optimism.
But yeah, those who were hired by Trump appointees for mid-level positions at, for instance, HHS, Justice, and Interior are going to have to be looked at very closely in terms of both qualifications and ideological tilt. If they were hired as loyalists (or loyalists of loyalists), well, that's life.
No, "restaffed from the ground up" does not mean "Fire park rangers." But when the fed govt is run by a party opposed to a huge number of its functions, whole structures start to erode or disintegrate. Entire internal divisions have been gutted & will require restaffing. Thus, "from the ground up."
I mean, to offer just one example, the Department of Education is being overseen by people who are ideologically committed to its future nonexistence. So fixing it is going to be much more of an effort than just putting people back at those empty desks and saying "As you were."
I imagine that you've talked, as I have, to people who came into federal agencies after the first four years of Trump and described their initial work as an almost forensic attempt to try to reconstruct what the agency had been when it was properly functioning; it will be much worse this time.
P.S. YES YES ALL RIGHT PROJECT 2029. Not 2028.
It's not. Rebuilding an agency from the ground up doesn't mean firing every single employee; it means understanding that the damage the Trump administration is doing goes far beyond job elimination and restaffing with boobs and ideologues and deep into areas like infrastructure and record-keeping.
If you come at this with ANY VERSION of "As if there'll even be elections" I will block you instantly. Thanks!
It is not too early for Democrats to build a Project 2028, because if we win, every single agency is going to have to be restaffed and rebuilt from the ground up in the first 100 days, and "We're going to undo the damage" can't be the sole item on our four-year agenda.READ NEXT POST BEFORE REPLYING>
I don't think there's really a way for me to boycott shows in advance because I might not like the way the dialogue is written.
There'd be big trouble if I didn't.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History567 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
567 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | H.R. 2913 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Con. Res. 84 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 2860 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | S. 254 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7618 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 6047 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 1993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 1003 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 2393 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 5317 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 4544 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 3234 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1299 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 5625 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H. Con. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1259 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1251 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 96 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1252 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 12Next →