At a Glance

Seat

Representative for North Carolina District 8

Born

April 24, 1966

Age 60

Phone

(202) 225-1976

Office

126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 567

Yes75%

No24%

Present0%

Not Voting0%

Party align93%

Cross-party1%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @RepMarkHarrisNC Facebook Instagram

External Resources

Wikipedia GovTrack OpenSecrets

Mark Harris

U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8

SoupScore

Mark's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 74 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 10(source)

[deep, concerned sigh]

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 10(source)

The only conclusion I can draw from this is that there is something physically wrong and cognitively wrong with Trump, he knows it, and he's angry and frightened.

Philip Bump

@pbump.com

Open post ↗

Every part of this is bonkers. The intro is bonkers. The transition to his health is bonkers. The mention that other presidents didn't need cognitive exams is bonkers. The claim that this screening test is somehow hard is bonkers. The idea that criticism of him is treason is bonkers. All of it.

There has never been a President that has worked as hard as me! My hours are the longest, and my results are among the best. I’ve stopped Eight Wars, saving many millions of lives in the process, created the Greatest Economy in the History of our Country, brought Business back into the United States at levels never seen before, rebuilt our Military, created the Largest Tax Cuts and Regulation Cuts, EVER, closed our open and very dangerous Southern Border, when previous Administrations were unable to do so, and created an “aura” around the United States of America that has led every Country in the World to respect us more than ever before. In addition to all of that, I go out of my way to do long, thorough, and very boring Medical Examinations at the Great Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, seen and supervised by top doctors, all of whom have given me PERFECT Marks — Some have even said they have never seen such Strong Results. I do these Tests because I owe it to our Country. In addition to the Medical, I have done something that no other President has done, on three separate occasions, the last one being recently, by taking what is known as a Cognitive Examination, something which few people would be able to do very well, including those working at The New York Times, and I ACED all three of them in front of large numbers of doctors and experts, most of whom I do not know. I have been told that few people have been able to “ace” this Examination and, in fact,

most do very poorly, which is why many other Presidents have decided not to take it at all. Despite all of this, the time and work involved, The New York Times, and some others, like to pretend that I am “slowing up,” am maybe not as sharp as I once was, or am in poor physical health, knowing that it is not true, and knowing that I work very hard, probably harder than I have ever worked before. I will know when I am “slowing up,” but it’s not now! After all of the work I have done with Medical Exams, Cognitive Exams, and everything else, I actually believe it’s seditious, perhaps even treasonous, for The New York Times, and others, to consistently do FAKE reports in order to libel and demean “THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.” They are true Enemies of the People, and we should do something about it. They have inaccurately reported on all of my Election Results and, in fact, were forced to apologize on much of what they wrote. The best thing that could happen to this Country would be if The New York Times would cease publication because they are a horrible, biased, and untruthful “source” of information. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 10(source)

I read this and thought, this can't be right because it would mean that only about 40,000 people vote in Miami mayoral races. Then I looked at the last two elections and...yup. Live and learn!

Taniel

@taniel.bsky.social

Open post ↗

JUST IN: It appears Democrats will win the mayor's office in Miami. This would be a flip from GOP. It's not final yet, but Democrat Eileen Higgins is up 61% to 39% as the first 23K ballots are counted. That's *the majority of votes cast*, & Election Day is no less Democratic today. More soon!

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 10(source)

An impressively high laughgasps-per-minute rate from Zach Woods.

Holly Green

@winnersusedrugs.bsky.social

Open post ↗

it's 2025 and the gangly guy who appeared on a few seasons of The Office is now our only mirror to society

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 9(source)

Isn't this Mr. "I'm leaving New York if Mamdani wins"?

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

I would like to make the point you were making, but louder and in the form of yelling it at you.

The Norman Rockwell guy standing up meme.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Fascinated by the Golden Globe nomination for "Cinematic and Box Office Achievement" for Avatar: Fire and Ash, a movie that has made zero dollars at the box office, and was not considered a strong enough cinematic achievement to get a best picture nomination. Globes gonna Globe, but come on.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Also important to understand that Trump, in full senile-emperor mode, will spend the next 12-18 months treating this as the idiot-showbiz version of Russia/Ukraine, playing both sides and twirling in the spotlight. Today he's semi-OK with Netflix and newly-repissed at Paramount. Tomorrow he'll flip.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

I hope that @warren.senate.gov, the @wgawest.bsky.social, the @wgaeast.bsky.social, and others who have rung alarm bells at the proposed Netflix acquisition of Warner Bros. will treat this hostile takeover bid from Paramount as at least as much of a threat.

Mark Harris

@markharris.bsky.social

Open post ↗

30+ movies a year. Wow. That's very impressive. This year Paramount released a grand total of 7, exactly one of which made the year's top 25 (while losing $), so there is zero reason to believe that the company has the means to more than quadruple its output. deadline.com/2025/12/para...

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Paramount Promises To Release 30+ Films Annually If It Acquires Warner Bros: “We’re Going To Satisfy The Needs Of The Moviegoing Public”

Should Paramount succeed in acquiring Warner Bros, the combined studio will release more than 30 theatrical titles a year. This was Paramount CEO David Ellison’s promise during a phone presser followi...

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Yeah, I agree with this. Writers need to get paid; people subscribing to publications and websites is how that happens. And writers need to get work, so we share what we do in an attempt to try interest people. No apologies for that.

Sam Adams

@samadams.bsky.social

Open post ↗

FYI this is an immediate block. You’re under no obligation to pay for my or anyone else’s work, but you won’t come onto my feed to complain about us earning a living.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

To sum up: 1. This will not "save" WB as a theatrical entity. 2. This would amount to handing over two studios to a right-wing tech billionaire. 3. The argument that this won't monopolize market share is true only bc Paramount does so badly it has no market share! www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/b...

Paramount Makes Hostile Bid for Warner Bros. Discovery

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

I love both One Battle After Another and Sinners, but if you don't think they're doing at least as much to work you over and get you to a certain emotional place as Hamnet is, I don't know what to tell you. There's no rule that it's okay to go for your adrenaline but cheating to go for your tears.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Hamnet is a superb film that shouldn't need defending, but apparently it does, so I'll just say that I can't count the number of Oscar seasons in which a movie labeled as "soft" or "manipulative" is attacked bc it putatively threatens the chances of a NOT-soft film that is at least as manipulative.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Yes, it's not Pacino/Scent of a Woman, which was "It's time, but jfc, for THIS?"

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

I wrote this for NY Mag back in 2009, but there is no Oscar narrative more powerful than "It's his/her time" when it strikes voters as true. When it works, a campaign doesn't need to say it out loud (and, in fact, shouldn't).

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

It does feel like if there are interesting showdowns/dark horse faves/late bloomers, they'll prob. be in the acting categories, not picture/director.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 8(source)

Sometimes when a sense of inevitability sets in during this early phase of awards season, Oscar voters get bored/irritated and go their own way. And sometimes, when a sense of inevitability sets in, it's exactly what it looks like. For me, a little too soon to tell which this is.

Sam Adams

@samadams.bsky.social

Open post ↗

at this point the only play for Best Picture is to take the long odds on anything that’s not One Battle After Another

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 7(source)

Hey, look at that! I feel taller already.

Verified Account Tracker

@verified.evil.gay

Open post ↗

✅ @markharris.bsky.social has been verified by @bsky.app.

Mark Harris@markharris.bsky.socialDec 7(source)

I can't believe Kiss and Stallone showed up for their Kennedy Center honors wearing rubber masks. Welcome to the resistance!

← Newer postsPosts page 68Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(14)

H.R. 8374 (119th)
To strike references to socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers in Federal law, and for …
H.R. 6715 (119th)
Child Predators Accountability Act
H.R. 6392 (119th)
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to recognize students who have completed secondary…
H.R. 6191 (119th)
To prohibit Federal funds to be used for certain abortion services.
H.R. 6141 (119th)
Fair Access to Justice for Union Members Act

Cosponsored Bills(74)

H.R. 9254 (119th)
To specify that the Southern Poverty Law Center shall not be treated as described in section…
Joined: 2026-06-10
H.R. 9132 (119th)
To prohibit foreign nationals from entering into or enforcing surrogacy contracts in the Uni…
Joined: 2026-06-03
H.R. 9131 (119th)
To prohibit surrogacy agencies from facilitating surrogacy contracts with sex offenders, and…
Joined: 2026-06-03
H. Res. 1338 (119th)
Supporting the designation of June as Family Month.
Joined: 2026-06-03
H. Res. 1314 (119th)
America 250 Commemorative Flag Act.
Joined: 2026-05-21

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

567 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-12-10	S. 1071 (119th)	Motion to Commit	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-12-10	H. Res. 936 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-10	H. Res. 936 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-10	H.R. 1676 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-09	S. 356 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-04	H.R. 1049 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-04	H.R. 1069 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-03	H.R. 1005 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-03	H.R. 4305 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-03	H.R. 2965 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-02	H. Res. 916 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-02	H. Res. 916 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-02	H.R. 4423 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-12-01	H.R. 5348 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-20	H.R. 1949 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-20	H.R. 3109 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-20	H. Res. 893 (119th)	Motion to Refer	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-20	H.R. 6019 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-20	H.R. 4058 (119th)	Fast-track passage	NO	YES	✕	Passed
2025-11-20	H.R. 5107 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-20	H.R. 5214 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-19	H. Res. 888 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-11-19	S.J. Res. 80 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-19	H.J. Res. 131 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-19	H.J. Res. 130 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-18	H. Res. 888 (119th)	Motion to Refer	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-11-18	H. Res. 878 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-18	H. Res. 879 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-18	H. Res. 879 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-18	H.R. 4405 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-18	H. Res. 878 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-11-18	H.R. 2659 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-17	H.R. 1608 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-13	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Accept Senate changes	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-11-12	H. Res. 873 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-19	H. Res. 719 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-19	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-19	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-18	H.R. 1047 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-18	H.R. 3015 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-18	H.R. 3062 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-17	H. Res. 713 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-09-17	H.R. 5143 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-17	H.R. 5125 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-17	H. Res. 722 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-17	H. Res. 722 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-16	H.R. 5140 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-16	H.R. 4922 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-16	H.R. 2721 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-16	H. Res. 707 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 12Next →