I’m glad we’re finally honoring our heroes who saved the Capitol on January 6th. As a member of the J6 Select Committee, I was proud to already have the plaque hanging outside my office. Unlike Republicans, I didn’t hang it up at 4am.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 18
Zoe Lofgren
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes42%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 18
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Zoe Lofgren
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 18
SoupScore
Zoe's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 113 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
These claims aren’t grounded in the facts or the law, and I applaud SJSU for standing their ground and defending their students and institution from these politicized attacks.
The Trump Administration is attempting to freeze their federal funding based on alleged Title IX violations during the 2022-24 volleyball seasons.
I firmly stand with @sanjosestate.bsky.social and the lawsuit they have just filed against the federal government to prevent punitive action against the university.
Donald Trump’s war in Iran isn’t just illegal, it’s expensive - costing taxpayers about $1,000,000,000 PER DAY and sending gas prices soaring.
Republicans can find money for bombs but not for Americans’ healthcare?
Last week, I talked with leaders from California Central Coast Joint Venture, Bay Planning Commission, and American Bird Conservancy to discuss ways that the federal government can support bird conservation efforts in #CA18 and protect our region’s beautiful biodiversity.
Yet another disastrous jobs report for Donald Trump. The Supreme Court offered him an offramp to end his job-killing tariffs, but he just keeps doubling down. How many more jobs have to be lost before House Republicans stand up to him?
Good riddance to Kristi Noem. I will still be voting today against the DHS bill that does nothing to rein in her lawless ICE agents.
Thank you to leaders from Kings, Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Clara Counties for visiting our office in DC last week! We had some productive discussions about water issues and how to support economic development in #CA18.
Democrats want to get funding to FEMA, TSA, and our Coast Guard while not writing a blank check to parts of DHS like ICE/ CBP that are brutalizing American communities. I’m supporting @delauro.house.gov’s bill to do just that, and Speaker Johnson should hold a vote on H.R. 7481 now.
Watch my full remarks: youtu.be/6_GYfFBY1k4?...
I just asked Kristi Noem why her masked ICE agents are breaking windows and dragging U.S. citizens out of their cars. Is that their training? She says these are “soft techniques”.
If these are soft techniques, the need for Congress to rein in ICE couldn’t be more obvious.
Americans do not want to invest billions of dollars in another war in the Middle East. I’m co-sponsoring the Khanna-Massie war powers resolution to ensure that this illegal war stops immediately.
It was a pleasure to speak at the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce’s annual legislative breakfast on Friday and discuss my work to boost our regional economy and support the successful small businesses that call the Salinas Valley home. #CA18
Before he was elected, Vice President Vance was adamantly opposed to war with Iran. Now that he’s in power, he’s cheerleading Trump’s illegal and reckless war.
Four brave American service members are already dead, and the administration is refusing to rule out boots on the ground. This war is not legal, and Trump has not made the case to the American people for why we should send more of our troops into harm’s way.
I recently had the opportunity to tour Second Harvest Santa Cruz in Watsonville, the first food bank in California. Their staff and volunteers are doing amazing work, and I’m fighting for them in Congress to address food insecurity and reverse devastating cuts to SNAP. #CA18
Thank you to leaders from @ucberkeleyofficial.bsky.social and the @setiinstitute.bsky.social for dropping by the office to discuss advancements in technosignature research and how they can be applied to NASA’s space-based missions.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.