Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes44%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 91 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

International law experts say even threatening to destroy civilian power plants and bridges is itself a potential war crime. Legal or not, no American president has ever spoken this way about any country.
This morning, the President of the United States posted that “a whole civilization will die tonight.” Not a military target. An entire civilization.
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
Trump went on a social media rant in the middle of the night to tell the Supreme Court to watch a Fox News show before ruling on birthright citizenship. This is the POTUS trying to pressure the highest court in the land with cable TV in the middle of the night. The man is unhinged.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump doesn’t seem to know if we’re winding down or escalating the war in Iran. Several weeks in, he still can’t clearly define the objective and Congress still hasn’t voted. If there’s no coherent strategy and no end game, why are Americans still risking their lives?
Trump doesn’t seem to know if we’re winding down or escalating the war in Iran. Several weeks in, he still can’t clearly define the objective and Congress still hasn’t voted. If there’s no coherent strategy and no end game, why are Americans still risking their lives?
The hypocrisy is staggering. And no one pays a bigger price for that silence than the service members whose lives Trump is risking with his unauthorized war in Iran.
Can you imagine if Obama had posted a psychotic rant at 8am on Easter Sunday? Republicans would have opened emergency impeachment hearings before noon. When Trump does it, silence.
The question was never whether AI would transform the economy. The question is how painful the transition will be, and whether anyone in power is doing anything to soften that landing.
This isn’t a distant threat. Boston Consulting Group says more than half of all U.S. jobs will be reshaped in the next two to three years. The economists who were skeptical a year ago are not skeptical anymore.
Economists are finally saying what workers already know: AI is coming for jobs, and quickly. Entry-level white-collar workers are already feeling it. College graduates can’t find work. Basic research tasks that used to require a human now require a prompt.
Today would be a great day for Trump to fire Pete Hegseth and replace him with someone who is actually competent. Every American and every soldier deployed abroad would be safer for it.
Trump’s tariffs sent costs up for gas and electricity. His trade war is making it harder to afford basic necessities. And now his response is to ELIMINATE heating assistance for low-income families. This is flat-out cruelty. thehill.com/policy/energ...
Reposted byMike Levin
10,000 veterans have lost their homes in the last 10 months. The highest foreclosure rate in a decade. The Trump administration was warned this would happen. They shut the program down anyway, with no replacement and one week's notice.
10,000 veterans have lost their homes in the last 10 months. The highest foreclosure rate in a decade. The Trump administration was warned this would happen. They shut the program down anyway, with no replacement and one week's notice.
Reposted byMike Levin
Hegseth has now fired or sidelined more than a dozen generals and admirals. He is an out-of-control, unqualified former TV host and nobody in the Republican Party will say a word about it because they don’t want to make Trump angry.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Army Chief of Staff, a combat veteran with tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, asked Pete Hegseth why he was blocking the promotions of two Black officers and two female officers who had earned them. Hegseth refused to answer. Then he fired him.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournNONOPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 11Next →