James P. McGovern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Massachusetts District 2
Born
November 20, 1959
Age 66
Phone
(202) 225-6101
Office
370 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 2

James P. McGovern

James Patrick McGovern is an American politician who has been a member of the United States House of Representatives since 1997, representing Massachusetts's 2nd congressional district since 2013. A Democrat, he is the ranking member of the House Rules Committee, chaired the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, and is the co-chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission. His district, numbered as the 3rd district from 1997 to 2013, stretches from Worcester to the Pioneer Valley.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes38%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 2

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
James P. McGovern headshot
James P. McGovern
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 2
SoupScore
James P.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 206 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Over 200 people in Athol this morning for Coffee with your Congressman! Great conversations. This is what democracy looks like. Thank you to everyone who took time out of your busy day to ask questions and share your opinions!
#Juneteenth recognizes the end of slavery in America. But it’s about more than an end—it’s about fighting for justice & working to heal the wounds of racism so all may be free & equal. Honored to join the Worcester Black Heritage Committee at the YWCA of Central Massachusetts for a flag raising.
What an awful ruling. Because of this rogue Supreme Court, trans kids will lose access to life-affirming and life-saving care. This decision does not protect children, it hurts them.
Today in #Skrmetti, SCOTUS allowed Tennessee's cruel ban on necessary care for young trans people to stand—a devastating blow to the most vulnerable in our community. Today is a loss, but we won't stop fighting for full equality. Read our statement at the link in our bio.
CEC Condemns SCOTUS's Failure to Protect Trans Americans' Access to Necessary Healthcare. “The Court’s ruling upholding Tennessee’s cruel and politically-motivated ban on medically-necessary care for young trans people undermines the ability of transgender patients, their families, and doctors to make medical decisions about accessing evidence-based care without politicians’ interference.” Rep. Mark Takano, Chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus. Read the full statement at the link in our bio. IMAGE: The words "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" etched in stone above the United States Supreme Court with the words "EQUAL JUSTICE" crossed out in red.
Knowledge is power. Our democracy depends on public libraries—doors open to all, wisdom shared by all, community built by all. Today Amherst breaks ground not just on major upgrades to the Jones Library, but on the promise of a building that will carry forward this dream to a future unseen.
I'm sick of politicians in Washington coming up with new ways to send young people to die in order to boost their political fortunes. I urge all my colleagues to join us on this important resolution, and to say enough is enough!
It's unconstitutional for any president to go to war without a vote in Congress. Period, end of story. I'm joining Rep. Thomas Massie on a bipartisan resolution to prohibit an unauthorized war with Iran.
Senate Republicans are pushing the same disastrous policies that will slash the food budgets of families with young kids, kick older adults off nutritional assistance, and take food away from hungry people all to fund tax breaks for billionaires.
Rep. Thomas Massie and Rep. Davidson—thank you for voting against this bill the first time around. I want to make sure you both know how your leadership has structured today’s rule vote.👀⬇️
Hey Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene—you said you voted for the bill and you “would have voted NO if I had known [a provision preventing AI regulation] was in there.” You’re getting a second chance later today. Will you actually vote against it now?
Hey Rep. Mike Flood, you said after voting for the tax scam that you would have voted against it if you had known it prevents judges from holding the Trump Admin in contempt for violating lawful court orders. You’re getting a second chance—will you actually vote against it now?
This morning, I notified every House member what today’s rule vote is really about: it’s the last chance for members to have a say on sending H.R. 1 to the Senate—there is NO separate vote on the changes put forward by Republican leadership.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 11Next →