
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 228 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
MOORE: If I give you a tax cut, am I spending out of the treasury to do that, yes or no?
BESSENT: Not if we create more income
MOORE: Okay. We're talking about a gambler's fallacy.
Scott Bessent fails to explain why Republicans, who have a trifecta, have chosen to make tax provisions meant to help everyday Americans TEMPORARY while relying on skewed bad math to justify PERMANENT tax cuts to the wealthiest among us.
Last week I was able to meet with my constituent, Ramon Morales Reyes.
Today we got the good news this upstanding member of the community has been granted bond. I will continue fighting to ensure everyone on U.S. soil is afforded due process.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
In a commentary, @rconniff.bsky.social praises @repgwenmoore.bsky.social and @pocan.house.gov for standing up to ICE wisconsinexaminer.com/2025/06/09/w...
Today I successfully met with my constituent Mr. Ramon Morales Reyes, who is being held in ICE detention.
Despite evidence revealing that Ramon was framed by the person who robbed him, he remains in jail. I will keep fighting to combat the misinformation spread by DHS & ensure he has due process.
Just as we saw during COVID, economic insecurity can lead to increases in domestic violence.
The GOP’s cruel cuts to things like SNAP and Medicaid will cause undue hardship, with similar devastating harms to women.
Domestic violence doesn't discriminate between Red and Blue zip codes, so our response as lawmakers needs to remain bipartisan, as it has been since the passage of VAWA in 1994.
Supporting survivors will never be 'waste, fraud and abuse,' no matter how much Donald Trump thinks it is.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Under the GOP Tax Scam, no one is too rich for a tax handout.
@repgwenmoore.bsky.social:
Republicans scrapped their own rules requiring 72 hours to read a bill so they could eke out a win in the middle of the night.
The American people are going to pay the price for Republican’s tax giveaways to billionaires with their health.
Donald Trump and the GOP are not ‘reforming’ the system, they’re strip mining it to serve the rich.
apnews.com/live/donald-...
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
We know that the GOP's big, ugly bill wants to cut $1 trillion dollars from essential services.
@repgwenmoore.bsky.social lays it all out: buff.ly/Xa7WnVu
I’m overjoyed and can certainly say the decision ICE made today to accept Yessenia’s appeal is the right one.
She is an upstanding member of the community fleeing trafficking who has the right to have her case heard.
She holds a valid work authorization. She is not a risk to public safety. Deporting her will not make our country safer.
My office is doing everything we can to prevent Ms. Yessenia Ruano Andres, a survivor of human trafficking, from being deported tomorrow.
She has been a pillar of our community for 14 years. She is a bilingual kindergarten teachers aid and a mother to two U.S. citizens.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Let us reintroduce ourselves: We are the Democratic Women’s Caucus.
96 women strong.
And we are fighting for you in Congress, in the courts, and in our communities.
@pocan.house.gov & I were granted access to the Dodge Co. facility contracted with ICE. While it was a well-run facility, I was concerned that I couldn’t talk to any detainees.
I will continue honoring my oversight responsibilities & fighting to protect the rights of everyone on American soil.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Just wrapped up a tour with @repgwenmoore.bsky.social of Wisconsin’s only ICE detention facility.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Joining my friend, @repgwenmoore.bsky.social, to visit the only ICE Detention Center in Wisconsin. We're exercising our constitutional congressional oversight duties.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | S. 1318 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 227 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 7959 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-23 | H.R. 5587 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1182 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | S. 1020 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 2493 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 5201 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 5200 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 1681 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 1156 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 1689 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Con. Res. 40 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 7613 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 1011 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.