Gwen Moore headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Wisconsin District 4
Born
April 18, 1951
Age 75
Phone
(202) 225-4572
Office
2252 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4

Gwen Moore

Gwendolynne Sophia Moore is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Wisconsin's 4th congressional district since 2005. In 2016, Moore was elected to serve as caucus whip of the Congressional Black Caucus for the 115th United States Congress. She is a member of the Democratic Party. Her district is based in Milwaukee and as a result of the 2011 redistricting also includes some Milwaukee County suburbs: Bayside, Brown Deer, Cudahy, Fox Point, Glendale, St. Francis, South Milwaukee, West Milwaukee, Shorewood, and Whitefish Bay. Moore is the first woman to represent the district and the second woman after Tammy Baldwin and the first African American elected to Congress from Wisconsin.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gwen Moore headshot
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 202 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Former SSA Commissioner O’Malley is exactly right. What’s happened now in 60 days is Elon Musk has poured fuel on the fire to cut staff, close field offices, and make it harder for people to access their earned Social Security benefits.
This is what “America First” really looks like—cruelty and neglect. Trump’s ruthless cuts are dismantling the social safety net, leaving everyday people without support — all while pushing for tax giveaways for billionaires and corporations. www.jsonline.com/story/news/h...
Trump sold his economic plan to the American people as one that would lower costs and inflation.   Instead, his hairbrained flip-flopping economic policies are doing the exact opposite.   He is breaking his campaign promises and leaving working Americans to pay the price.
🚨"Farmers in Trump country were counting on clean energy grants. Then the government moved the goalposts." Let's be very clear: Donald Trump is fine with hurting farmers by pushing policies that favor Big Oil over rural livelihoods. wisconsinwatch.org/2025/03/farm...
The tax code should reward hard work, not just wealth. The EITC helps working families get ahead, but too many workers are left behind. My bill, the #WRCRAct, would create a fairer tax system—one that values labor, including unpaid labor, over tax breaks for the rich.
Speaking up WORKS. We must keep the pressure on. Keep making your voices heard, and I promise I will never stop speaking up for my constituents, and Americans in every zip code, who would suffer if they could not access their Social Security benefits. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
For half a century, the EITC has been a lifeline for hardworking Americans, lifting millions out of poverty and rewarding work. I’m fighting to protect and expand the EITC because the tax code should work for Americans building a better life — not just the wealthy few.
Today I was joined by @chu.house.gov & amazing advocates to reintroduce the Worker Relief and Credit Reform Act, which would modernize and expand the EITC. It's time for a tax code that works for WORKERS, not more tax giveaways to the wealthiest few. #EITC50 #WRCRact
Today is #EqualPayDay—a reminder that women still earn less than men for the same work. Equal work deserves equal pay. Now is the time to push forward, not to rollback decades of progress by stripping protections for women in the workplace.
🚨"A flood of cuts led by Elon Musk has sent the agency into chaos."   The GOP plan: sacrifice the social safety net to make room for tax cuts for Elon and Wall Street.   Fail to be born rich or get rich? Have the audacity to get old? You're on your own. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Billionaire Howard Lutnick and the GOP say missing a Social Security check is no big deal. Tell that to the millions of Americans who need it.   This isn’t just callous commentary—it’s insight in to the GOP: they don’t care about you so why not starve Social Security.
Trump and Musk’s cuts are already slowing service, causing confusion, and harming our seniors. Social security beneficiaries, the majority of whom are women, deserve their hard-earned benefits.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk don't think senior citizens and disabled Americans deserve to get a real person on the phone to assist with their Social Security benefits.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk don't think senior citizens and disabled Americans deserve to get a real person on the phone to assist with their Social Security benefits.
NEW: The Social Security Administration is rushing cuts to phone services at the White House's request, the agency's acting commissioner told Social Security advocates in a meeting on Monday, two sources who attended tell Axios.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournNONOPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNOYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 11Next →