Because of a change in the U.S. Senate voting schedule, I am postponing the Klamath, Lake, Deschutes, Crook, and Jefferson County town halls scheduled for 3/20 and 3/21.
An updated event schedule and invitations will be shared in the coming weeks, so please stay tuned!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Oregon
Jeff Merkley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes26%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeff Merkley
U.S. SenatorDemocratOregon
SoupScore
Jeff's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 93 sponsored · 406 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Because of a change in the U.S. Senate voting schedule, I am postponing the Klamath, Lake, Deschutes, Crook, and Jefferson County town halls scheduled for 3/20 and 3/21.
An updated event schedule and invitations will be shared in the coming weeks, so please stay tuned!
Because of a change in the U.S. Senate voting schedule, I am postponing the Klamath, Lake, Deschutes, Crook, and Jefferson County town halls scheduled for 3/20 and 3/21.
An updated event schedule and invitations will be shared in the coming weeks, so please stay tuned!
Because of a change in the U.S. Senate voting schedule, I am postponing the Klamath, Lake, Deschutes, Crook, and Jefferson County town halls scheduled for 3/20 and 3/21.
An updated event schedule and invitations will be shared in the coming weeks, so please stay tuned!
Because of a change in the U.S. Senate voting schedule, I am postponing the Klamath, Lake, Deschutes, Crook, and Jefferson County town halls scheduled for 3/20 and 3/21.
An updated event schedule and invitations will be shared in the coming weeks, so please stay tuned!
Déjà vu: Democrats AGAIN offered a bill to make sure TSA agents get their paychecks.
AND AGAIN Republicans blocked it!!
Republicans are keeping TSA agents from getting paid!
Because of a change in the U.S. Senate voting schedule, I am postponing the Klamath, Lake, Deschutes, Crook, and Jefferson County town halls scheduled for 3/20 and 3/21.
An updated event schedule and invitations will be shared in the coming weeks, so please stay tuned!
Republicans claim the SAVE America Act would make it harder for noncitizens to vote. That’s a lie.
They might as well call it the “Stop Citizens from Voting Act.”
This bill is all about stopping some American citizens who Trump doesn’t want to vote from casting their ballot.
I commend the women who came forward to bravely tell their stories and recount decades of pain. Powerful men, no matter who they are, must be held accountable for abuse, grooming, and rape.
Republicans say their bill is about keeping noncitizens from voting. That’s a lie! The Republican bill is about stopping CITIZENS from voting—married women, students, Tribal communities. It’s just plain wrong.
Democrats just offered a bill to make sure TSA agents get their paychecks. AGAIN.
Republicans blocked it. AGAIN.
Republicans need to get serious about paying critical federal workers.
Trump said he’d end wars and lower costs but he’s starting wars and raising costs.
His chaotic tariffs are taking money out of YOUR pocket as he wages an illegal war with Iran that is costing taxpayers more than $1 billion EVERY DAY.
We need justice for Epstein’s victims and real accountability for abusers.
A group of senators is calling for an independent audit over the Department of Justice’s handling of the Epstein files.
https://www.koin.com/news/oregon/horrific-scandal-merkley-calls-for-audit-over-dojs-redactions-to-epstein-files/?cid=bluesky_
Trump’s war of choice with Iran has already cost taxpayers MORE THAN $11 BILLION as prices for everything from groceries to gas skyrocket.
Pure authoritarian government: using licenses to silence the press. We must stop Trumpism. Let's save our Republic!
Around the world, we’re seeing powerful men being held accountable because of the Epstein Files—a prince, a former prime minister.
We need to follow suit here in America. No one is above the law, including the President.
abcnews.com/US/epstein-f...
Trump’s illegal war with Iran has no clear objective and no exit plan.
He’s raising costs on families, shredding the Constitution, and risking our national security—and there’s no plan.
Pete Hegseth wasted $93 BILLION in one MONTH. It’s indefensible—a $98,000 piano, $12,000 for fruit basket stands, and the list goes on and on (and on).
Just another reason why Hegseth has got to go. newrepublic.com/post/207555/...
Trump and his oil-obsessed mega donors are hellbent on killing our planet to extract every last drop of oil—at the expense of our health and environment. With Trump it’s polluters over people, every single time. www.nytimes.com/2026/03/14/c...
Visit my website for more information on my Jefferson County Town Hall on 3/21 ⬇️ www.merkley.senate.gov/merkley-anno...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History782 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
782 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | YES | NO | ✕ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | YES | NO | ✕ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.