Pete Hegseth should be ashamed.
Harvey Milk served this country with honor—first in the Navy, then as a trailblazing public servant.
Erasing his name from a Navy ship during Pride Month is a petty, disgraceful insult to his legacy and to LGBTQI+ Americans who continue to serve.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes38%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 163 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
These aren't just numbers on a page—they're cancer patients, kids with asthma, seniors in nursing homes.
I'm fighting this dangerous bill with everything I’ve got, because Republicans ripping away health care from our family, friends, and neighbors is cruel, and it will cost lives.
The official position from the Trump Administration now seems to be that nearly 14 million people don't deserve to continue having health care coverage.
Today, @raskin.house.gov and I called on Judiciary Republicans to convene a Committee hearing after DHS agents forcibly entered my district office without a warrant or consent and handcuffed a member of my staff.
Happy #PrideMonth! 🏳️🌈
This month, we celebrate love, authenticity, and the courage of the LGBTQI+ community.
I’m proud to stand with the LGBTQI+ community, this month and every month, in the fight for full equality.
Trump’s reckless reconciliation bill includes the biggest SNAP cut in history—threatening to take food off the table for millions. Parents, kids, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities will pay the price.
www.americanprogress.org/article/hous...
Beyond the cruelty, these shameful tactics are designed to make immigrants afraid to engage with our legal system. Combined with efforts to gut asylum and end TPS protections, the Trump Administration is making it impossible to come “the right way.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/u...
Republicans love to say immigrants should “come the right way.” But when immigrants follow the law and show up to court, they’re being ambushed by ICE and fast-tracked for deportation.
Today’s court decision striking down Trump’s unlawful tariffs is a win for the Constitution and the rule of law.
The Court made clear what Republicans refused to confront: Trump’s abuse of emergency powers to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs violated the law and the separation of powers.
This ruling confirms what I’ve said from the start: there’s no legitimate legal basis for the Trump Administration to shut down congestion pricing.
Today, the court agreed, temporarily blocking the administration’s threats to cut off critical transportation funding and calling out its abuse of power for what it is.
This morning, I stood with fellow congestion pricing advocates to send a clear message to Donald Trump: New Yorkers won’t back down. We’re reducing traffic, cutting pollution, and investing in better transit.
I told the Commission what I’ve said many times: if President Trump were serious about combating antisemitism, he would start with his own administration—including firing Kingsley Wilson, Ed Martin, and Sebastian Gorka. Instead, Trump has promoted Wilson to serve as the Pentagon’s press secretary.
Last week, I participated in a Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearing, where I highlighted Kingsley Wilson’s history of antisemitism.
He was also the Dean of our NYS Congressional Delegation. But most importantly he was a friend and a former colleague that I will personally miss. May his memory be a blessing.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.