Jerrold Nadler headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 12
Born
June 13, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 225-5635
Office
2132 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12

Jerrold Nadler

Voting Record — 592
Yes38%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 12

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jerrold Nadler headshot
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 163 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Just last week, the Supreme Court of the United States struck down this xenophobic and unconstitutional executive action. I'm proud to celebrate the anniversary of the 14th Amendment and defend our Constitution from attacks by a tyrannical president.
For 158 years, the 14th Amendment has guaranteed citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the United States. Donald Trump tried and failed to undermine the 14th Amendment by obliterating the right to birthright citizenship via executive order.
Blizzards don’t discriminate between red states and blue states. Trump and FEMA need to stop denying the millions of $$$ of federal aid to New York and help us recover from February’s disastrous storm. Instead of further politicizing needed aid, Trump needs to approve this funding immediately.
The USDA reported a roughly 12 percent drop in nationwide SNAP enrollment. This change reflects not a declining need for assistance, but the unwillingness of the federal government to help Americans in times of need.
The new lanes will improve pedestrian and cyclist safety and make trips faster and more efficient for hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who rely on bus transportation every day.
As a proud champion for congestion pricing and improved mass transit, I am pleased to celebrate the opening of these new bus lanes. Our city must have fast, safe, and reliable mass transit, and dedicated bus lanes help achieve this goal by keeping NYers moving and reducing traffic on the streets.
It’s not too late. I urge the Republican-controlled Rules Committee to allow my bipartisan amendment to come to the House floor. Congress must have the opportunity to clearly demonstrate its intent and reject this misguided proposal. The People’s House deserves a vote.
As a former Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, she knows that her former office—the office attempting to subsume and eliminate SEHI under the leadership of the unqualified partisan henchman Yehuda Kaploun—is the wrong address for this important work and why preserving SEHI matters.
Thousands of New Yorkers cannot afford to stay in their homes due to crushing costs of Donald Trump's affordability crisis. Meanwhile, Trump is still refusing to sign the transformative, bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act into law to address this housing crisis. gothamist.com/news/more-th...
🇺🇸Happy Independence Day 🇺🇸 America’s 250th birthday is a reminder that this country was founded on the principle that all of us are created equal. For 250 years, that promise has motivated patriotic Americans to fight to protect and strengthen our democracy.
Trump's immigration policies are cruel, inhumane, and chaotic. It’s no surprise that states and localities do not want to expend their limited resources to aid and abet his extreme and illegal agenda.
Today's ruling by the Supreme Court is devastating for so many young people who just want to play with their friends at school but who, simply because of who they are, have become pawns in political games. Read CEC Chair @repmarktakano.bsky.social's full statement on the decision here:
Equality Caucus condemns SCOTUS ruling upholding anti-trans sports bans.
“The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold states’ discriminatory, anti-trans categorical sports bans is incredibly disappointing and a failure by the Court to protect the rights of transgender young people. This is a devastating ruling for so many young people who just want to play with their friends at school but who, simply because of who they are, have become pawns in political games. States should be focusing on breaking down barriers to participation, not building them up. We have already seen the harms of these categorical bans on all girls, and this ruling will continue those harms in all of the states that have enacted these categorical bans.” Rep. Mark Takano, Chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus
While far-right attacks against our democracy and civil liberties will not cease with this ruling, today’s Supreme Court decision affirms a fundamental constitutional principle that has defined our nation for generations: every child born in the United States is a citizen of the United States.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
592 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 12Next →