Great news for folks across Northwest Colorado — from Craig, Steamboat Springs, Grand County and everywhere in between! 🚈⛰️
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Colorado District 2
Joe Neguse
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes43%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Joe Neguse
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratColorado District 2
SoupScore
Joe's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 92 sponsored · 181 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
In an effort to conceal their scheme to sell off our public lands, House Republicans were ordered by their leadership not to debate or even speak during our 13-hour committee proceeding.
Reposted byRep. Joe Neguse
My Republican colleagues believe a top priority for their constituents is renaming the Gulf of Mexico.
Seriously.
I can confidently say the people of Colorado think otherwise.
Surreal and ridiculous.
👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
My Republican colleagues believe a top priority for their constituents is renaming the Gulf of Mexico.
Seriously.
I can confidently say the people of Colorado think otherwise.
“These tariffs are going to put small businesses out of business because they can’t adjust that quickly.”
👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
The reckless proposal by House Republicans to slash Medicaid funding would harm working families across America.
It must be rejected.
Talk is cheap, and actions speak louder than words.
The time for my Republican colleagues to stop capitulating to President Trump is now.
The Trump administration’s reported plans to dismantle our scientific agencies — which keep our country informed on dangerous natural disasters — is reckless and dangerous.
We're going to continue to push back.
As we kick off the month of May, watch our recap below of our visits across Western & Northern Colorado over the past few weeks — from town halls, community forums, and meetings with ranchers, farmers, and citizens across our state, we’ll keep showing up!
👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
From his induction into the Colorado Running Hall of Fame as a high school athlete to his dedication to academics, Josh’s accomplishments have been exceptional!
It was an honor to nominate Josh to the U.S. Air Force Academy— we’re all cheering him on as he begins this exciting journey 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Reposted byRep. Joe Neguse
President Trump’s reckless tariffs are creating economic chaos. The American people did not sign up for the so-called “short-term pain” that House Republicans are selling.
Republicans refused — literally — to even debate our amendment protecting grants to local police. Apparently they were told by their leadership not to say anything during the entire 10 hour hearing (seriously).
One of the strangest things I’ve ever observed in Congress.
House Republicans plan to do a fire sale of our public lands.
Citizens across Colorado won’t stand for it.
100 days into the Trump administration, and one thing is crystal clear:
This moment calls for moral courage.
My Republican colleagues should stop hiding from their constituents, and stand up for the communities they represent.
Grateful to celebrate Arbor Day & Earth Day a few days back with the Erie community. We will keep tackling environmental challenges, as we work together to protect our environment and public lands in Colorado and beyond! 🌎🌳
When you represent a congressional district that spans 12,000 square miles (larger than 8 states!), you learn that showing up in every community, no matter how small, matters.
And that’s exactly what I’ll keep doing — each and everyday — across Northern & Western Colorado.
The Trump administration has created a “Polluter’s Portal” for companies to avoid regulations on toxic chemicals like mercury, arsenic and benzene.
Seriously.
Reposted byRep. Joe Neguse
TONIGHT: @neguse.house.gov joins @lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com on The #LastWord at 10pm ET.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.