Chellie Pingree headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Maine District 1
Born
April 2, 1955
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-6116
Office
2354 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1

Chellie Pingree

Voting Record — 592
Yes41%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Chellie Pingree headshot
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I'll never forget what I saw inside Dilley during my oversight visit this spring. Children are being treated like criminals and subjected to needless trauma. That's why I joined 110 House Democrats in demanding that the Trump Admin #ShutDownDilley, end family detention, and free the children.
Graphic that reads: 

END FAMILY DETENTION NOW 

SHUT DOWN DILLEY AND STOP LOCKING UP KIDS
As ICE prepares to ramp up its campaign of cruelty, it’s important that everyone know their rights. Feel free to share the link below.   Here in Maine, we look out for our friends and neighbors. That means standing with our immigrant communities and doing everything we can to help and protect them.
More than 300,000 Haitians lost their TPS today. ICE is preparing to deport as many of them as possible.   The Admin claims Haiti's conditions have improved enough for TPS holders to return safely. Yet the State Department maintains a "Do Not Travel" advisory for the country.   It's unconscionable.
Many paper mills rely on raw materials imported from Canada (like wood pulp). Paper manufacturers will be forced to pass those costs on to their customers. Trump’s reckless and combative trade policies are undermining Maine businesses and hurting consumers, who are already feeling the squeeze.
Maine imports more than $5B in goods from Canada each year. They’re by far our biggest international trade partner. If Trump’s reckless tariffs go into effect, it could make a whole lot of things more expensive, from wine to hockey gear. The impacts on wood products could be especially disastrous.
The Administration isn't interested in respecting the full scope of America’s history. All they care about is fast-tracking the Trump's vanity projects. I will fight every attempt to weaken these critical safeguards or silence the communities and experts who deserve to have a seat at the table.
Rewriting Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act—behind closed doors, on a rushed timeline, and without meaningful input from states, Tribes, preservation experts, or the public—is beyond reckless. This will dramatically weaken one of our most important historic preservation laws.
The idea that any Administration, regardless of party, should be allowed to cancel or withhold funding based on purely political considerations, and in direct defiance of the Constitution, is deeply un-American. I will be demanding answers from the DOE. (5/5)
To make matters worse, the Admin has proposed a sweeping regulation that would formalize this type of political influence over federal spending at the expense of critical services to millions of Americans—giving people like Russ Vought the authority to cancel grants on a whim. (4/5)
For the communities that were relying on this funding, this is a devastating blow. These projects would’ve built significant clean-energy infrastructure, helped families lower their bills, and created thousands of good-paying jobs. Projects that Congress already authorized and funded. (3/5)
From Day 1, this Admin has weaponized federal funding to punish their political opponents and reward their allies, blatantly defying the Constitution. These cuts are just one example of their arrogance and callousness—and their maniacal obsession with punishing their perceived enemies. (2/5)
🧵 It was bad enough that the Admin illegally cancelled $7.5 billion in DOE grants for clean-energy projects—including in Maine. That they based their cuts purely on politics—targeting states with Democratic governors, or that voted for Kamala Harris—is outrageous. This is an huge scandal. (1/5)
He’s already sabotaging the agreement, of course, but if any deal deserves to fall apart, it’s this one. We should be working to REDUCE the number of nuclear weapons, not giving one of the most oppressive countries on earth the tools to build their own.
Trump’s argument for starting a war with Iran was about not allowing a dangerous regime to get nukes. Now he wants to let Saudi Arabia—an oppressive country that’s committed innumerable human rights abuses and produced most of the 9/11 hijackers—to have access to those same technologies? Batshit.
It’s bad enough that Hegseth has used the so-called “ceasefire” to avoid Congressional authorization for Trump's reckless war. Now he’s using it to diminish the lives of those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our country. He needs to go—and this senseless war needs to end. NOW.
On Wednesday, DoD's website showed 18 U.S. troops had lost their lives during the war in Iran. The next day, it was down to 14. Why? Because four of the deaths happened “after President Trump declared a ceasefire in April.” Dismissing these tragic deaths in such a cold, callous way is disgusting.
So who is the real threat to our communities? Working fathers like Johan, or ICE agents who mistake their targets and shoot innocent people? The fear and terror ICE is inflicting on communities across this country is reprehensible. ICE must be abolished.
Johan Sebastian Guerrero wanted a better life for his family. Like generations before him—my grandparents and so many others—he came here in search of the American dream. He worked. Paid taxes. No criminal record. He was doing everything Republicans say he was supposed to. ICE killed him anyway.
Silver lining: We passed another War Powers resolution. Trump will ignore it, but it’s clear the pressure and frustration is only growing. Republicans aren't fit to govern. Democrats are fighting back every single day—and showing the American people that we are the party that is fighting for THEM.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
592 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 12Next →