Chellie Pingree headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Maine District 1
Born
April 2, 1955
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-6116
Office
2354 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1

Chellie Pingree

Chellie Pingree is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Maine's 1st congressional district since 2009. Her district includes most of the southern part of the state, centered around the Portland area.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 566
Yes41%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Chellie Pingree headshot
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

As part of Trump's illegal push to dismantle the Department of Education, his Administration has gutted the Office for Civil Rights. Firing half of OCR’s staff has triggered a collapse in civil rights case resolutions, from 1,300 a year to just 65. This is incredibly alarming.
@democrats-appropriations.house.gov will be marking up Republicans’ Interior + Environment funding bill this week. As the top Dem on the Subcommittee, I will be fighting to protect these national treasures and the people who keep them running.
As Ranking Member of @democrats-appropriations.house.gov Subcommittee that oversees the EPA, I will fight to hold Trump’s EPA accountable to its legal and moral obligation to protect Americans, not polluters.
Without independent EPA scientists, who will determine if chemicals are safe? The same industries that profit from them. Without ORD, EPA stops being a protector of public health and becomes little more than a rubber stamp for industry.
For decades, ORD has been the backbone of independent, science-based policymaking, producing groundbreaking research on cancer-causing chemicals, forever chemicals like PFAS, and disaster response tools we relied on after Deepwater Horizon and Hurricane Katrina.
ORD is mandated by federal law throughout the US Code, + Congress appropriated $758M specifically for EPA's research initiatives this fiscal year. So, no—this isn’t “delivering $758 million in savings.” It’s stealing Congressionally appropriated and mandated funding. In other words, it’s illegal.
Eliminating the Office of Research and Development is much more than belt-tightening. It’s a calculated assault on science, public health, and the very core of EPA’s mission. This move will leave American families breathing dirtier air, drinking contaminated water, + facing unchecked climate risks.
On top of freezing Title X funding, Republicans used their Big Ugly Bill to defund health care providers like @ppfa.org + @mefamilyplanning.bsky.social. I talked to Olivia Pennington about the harm this bill will cause, MFP’s lawsuit against the Admin, and the critical care that’s now in jeopardy.
This is money that would’ve gone to local programs like arts education and book groups for veterans. I’m fighting back with an amendment to restore this critical funding. We cannot give up on the artists, educators, and local institutions that enrich our rural and underserved communities.
The Administration is waging an unprecedented assault on the arts, history, and culture—and Republicans are paving the way for even deeper cuts in the FY26 funding bill. The kicker? They’ve already diverted $34 million from the NEA + NEH in their Big Ugly Bill to pay for Trump’s “Garden of Heroes.”
As my colleague @quigley.house.gov‬ so aptly said in supporting my amendment, when it comes to public transportation, “We’re all in this together.” If we want America to reach its full potential, we have to invest in our roads, bridges, and waterways.
I might be the only member of Congress who has to take a ferry to get to work. But millions of Americans rely on them. I just introduced an amendment to restore vital funding for ferry grant programs. Surprise, surprise—Republicans voted it down.
Every district in the country has a housing crisis. Here in Maine, we need to build 84,000 homes by 2030 to meet demand. So why did Republicans vote down @delauro.house.gov's amendment to unlock more funding for affordable housing? People are *begging* for help. Republicans just aren’t listening.
The impacts will be huge. In 2024, international tourists spent more than $9 BILLION in Maine. Canadians alone spent $500 million. If these trends continue, it would spell disaster. Tourism is vital to Maine’s economy—and our communities. This president’s actions are putting it all at risk.
In June 2024, ~300K international visitors entered the U.S. through Maine. Last month, that number fell to ~210K. A 30% drop. Most of these visitors are Canadian. Whether it’s his reckless trade war or threatening to make Canada our 51st state, Trump’s policies are keeping our neighbors away.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
566 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-12H.R. 2853 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2071 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30S. 4465 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2026-04-30S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-29S. 1318 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 227 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 7959 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-23H.R. 5587 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1182 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-04-21S. 1020 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 2493 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 5201 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 5200 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 12Next →