I'm joining @robinkelly.house.gov and 12 of my colleagues in calling on Prime's CEO to follow the law by respecting these nurses' right to organize and ensure that patients have access to high-quality care.
No nurse should have to choose between standing up for their patients and keeping their job.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Prime Healthcare has fired or suspended 20 CMMC nurses since August—reportedly because they stood up for patients and exercised their union rights.
It's not an isolated incident. Nurses in IL, NV + CA have raised similar concerns about retaliation, staffing and patient care.
This would be ILLEGAL.
This is an absolutely disgusting use of taxpayer dollars—and a chilling snapshot of the sadism and cruelty that fuel people like Stephen Miller.
Add it to the long and growing list of abuses that Democrats will be investigating when we retake Congress.
Some have a Do Not Travel advisory, the State Department's highest danger level.
Meanwhile, they've slashed the number of LEGAL refugees entering the US, from a peak of 100K under Biden to ~18K this year.
Nearly all are White Afrikaners—which says a lot about who they deem “worthy" of accepting.
🧵
For years, the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration served a humanitarian role.
The Admin “reorganized” it and gave it a new name: the Office of Remigration.
It's since spent over $400 million paying countries to accept deported migrants, despite having NO connection to those countries.
I thought he couldn’t get lower than trying to rename the Kennedy Center. Now he has his sights set on Ford’s Theatre?
What is his obsession with trying to overshadow assassinated presidents?
It’s absurd—and would defile a historic site.
Is the supposed “Party of Lincoln” going to stand for this?
Justice for Johan. Alex. Renée. Ruben. Lorenzo. Wilber. And the countless others whose lives have been destroyed by ICE—while their families are left to pick up the pieces.
ICE shot Alex Pretti in the back. A few days ago, they shot Wilber Rafael Garces Perez in the back.
Wilber remains in custody with the bullet lodged near his spine. DHS is still trying to deport him.
ALL of these shootings demand full, independent investigations.
ICE shot Alex Pretti in the back. A few days ago, they shot Wilber Rafael Garces Perez in the back.
Wilbur remains in custody with the bullet lodged near his spine. DHS is still trying to deport him.
ALL of these shootings demand full, independent investigations.
When ICE kills someone, they’re not just taking one life. They’re destroying a family and community.
Sean Murphy, who represents the family of Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, delivered powerful testimony during today's @oversightdemocrats.bsky.social hearing.
Please watch and listen to every word.
We’ll be hearing testimony from the victims’ loved ones, who are demanding answers—and justice—from this Administration.
Congress has a duty to demand a full accounting of these tragic events and hold federal officials accountable.
If Republicans refuse to do their job, we’ll do it for them.
Together with @blumenthal.senate.gov, @robertgarcia.house.gov, @repilhan.bsky.social, @repsuhas.bsky.social, @repyassansari.bsky.social, and @repwesleybellmo.bsky.social, I’m joining an @oversightdemocrats.bsky.social hearing on the string of fatal ICE shootings across our country.
Starting soon 👇
Here's Trump casually threatening to "annihilate" Iran in front of the UN Assembly.
What he’s saying would constitute war crimes. This man has the nuclear codes.
It’s astounding how hellbent he is on violating domestic and international law practically every time he opens his mouth.
Horrifying.
Mainers could’ve seen a huge investment in solar to help them save money. Instead they’ll be paying hundreds or thousands more for oil this winter.
What Trump has done is illegal, morally bankrupt, and totally detached from reality.
I’m calling on the EPA to comply and reinstate these grants NOW.
Energy costs have skyrocketed on Trump’s watch.
Instead of doing things that actually help people—like supporting the Solar for All program, which will help thousands of low-income and disadvantaged households lower their bills—he's obsessed with dismantling clean energy projects nationwide.
🧵
In August 2025 the EPA announced it was illegally terminating awards under the Solar for All program across the US—including $62 million in Maine.
I immediately sent a letter blasting the agency for its unlawful decision. Last week, a federal judge agreed, ruling the funding must be restored.
The Administration isn’t doing a damn thing about it.
Maine's DOER has put together a helpful guide for Mainers who may need help this winter (see next post for link).
The harm Trump's regime is doing to hardworking families across the country is reprehensible.
Their betrayals won’t be forgotten.
The average price of heating oil in Maine hit $5.77 a gallon last week.
That’s a 74% increase from 2025.
This is a disaster for Mainers, half of whom rely on heating oil.
At a time when food and fuel costs are rising and millions are struggling, many families will be forced to make hard choices.
Congress appropriated $257M for renovations, *on top of* the $37M in annual funding.
But we know what this is really about to Trump: himself.
The KC is a living memorial to JFK. Trump is killing it with his gross mismanagement, nonstop meddling, and egomania.
We won't let him get away with it.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.