Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2
Mark Pocan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes41%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 145 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This guy wants to be a dictator so bad.
Why is everything getting so damn expensive?
One major reason: corporate monopolies are squeezing consumers. This week on my podcast, I’m joined by Barry Lynn of Open Markets Institute to dig into how corporate greed and consolidation drive up costs.
youtu.be/qmMzA1Ovqqc
I’ll be holding a press conference with @sensmithwi.bsky.social, State Rep. Ryan Spaude, and Wisconsinites who will see their 2026 health insurance premiums skyrocket due to Congressional Republicans' refusal to extend the expiring ACA credits.
Tune in today on Instagram live at 12:00pm CT.
This is an Orwellian effort to criminalize Americans' beliefs and speech.
We must ensure people understand that their rights and freedoms are at risk. (3/3)
It lets Trump and Stephen Miller interpret anything they deem as “anti-American”, “anti-Christianity”, or “anti-capitalist” as politically violent and orders the FBI and law enforcement to investigate and "disrupt" groups or individuals they don't like. (2/3)
We should be yelling about this from the rooftops! Trump issued a presidential memorandum outlining plans for crackdowns on free speech that he doesn’t like, called “NSPM-7.” (1/3)
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
Folks should never have to choose between life-saving healthcare and keeping a roof over their heads.
At a time when too many are feeling the pressure of rising costs, Trump's budget threatens to make healthcare significantly more expensive for thousands of Wisconsinites.
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
The American people are with Democrats on this. They don’t want their health care ripped away from them or jacked up.
In case you missed it, here’s what happened.
📃Epstein Files – Johnson is refusing to swear in Rep.-Elect Grijalva, who would be the 218th signature to force a vote on releasing the Epstein Files.
The House should be in session, not on vacation! (3/3)
💵 Negotiating full year appropriations bills that aren’t stacked with partisan riders and harmful cuts, and could actually become law.
🐄 Farm Bill – overdue by TWO years. (2/3)
In the middle of a government shutdown, Speaker Johnson canceled votes and told his members not to bother coming back to DC.
Here’s just a couple of the important issues we should be in DC working on:
⚕️ Extending the ACA tax credits and ending the GOP shutdown. (1/3)
My Republican colleagues want to see the Affordable Care Act subsidies expire, raising healthcare costs for just about everyone.
I believe that every American deserves healthcare they can afford. This is what we are fighting for.
Why do Republicans want people to pay more for healthcare?
FACT: Undocumented immigrants are already barred under federal law from accessing Medicare, Medicaid, and healthcare tax credits. Democrats in Congress are NOT trying to change this.
We ARE fighting to extend healthcare tax credits to prevent Americans' premiums from skyrocketing.
Joining @MSNBC.com in just a few minutes to discuss the GOP shutdown.
REMINDER: Democrats were the ones who banned hidden junk fees on tickets, hotels, airlines, and other areas that affect everyday Americans!
We need to tax the rich! They’ve rigged the system for too long. Repost if you agree.
Signing off for the weekend? Thank a union.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | PRESENT | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.