Trump claimed his across-the-board tariffs were “fair.” They are just stupid. I explain the concept of “fair” to Trump with
@jonathanjackson.house.gov by using a magic trick.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=390h...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2
Mark Pocan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 143 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
Trump’s tariffs almost crashed the economy and Republicans voted for a bill that forces cuts to Medicaid and food assistance. A bit of a cluster…
Reminder: Elon Musk took taxpayer money to build his empire, then turned around and cut jobs, gutted services, and fought unions that benefit everyone else.
I don’t care if you’re a Democrat, Republican, or neither — more than 1 million Wisconsinites rely on Medicaid, and I’m never going to stop fighting like hell to protect it!
This coming Wednesday, I will be hosting a town hall in Green County, Wisconsin! It will also be streaming live on TikTok.
Interesting…
Thanks, Grok!
As chair of the Congressional HIV/AIDS Caucus, I’m honored to introduce a resolution to recognize April 10 as National Youth HIV/AIDS Awareness Day. Youth make up 19 percent of new HIV diagnoses in the US, and raising awareness is key to slowing down future infections.
Trump’s tariffs almost crashed the economy and Republicans voted for a bill that forces cuts to Medicaid and food assistance. A bit of a cluster…
The national minimum wage has been stuck at $7.25 for more than 15 years – the longest period in history without an increase. That’s why I’m a co-sponsor of the Raise the Wage Act, which would gradually raise the federal minimum wage to a livable one.
Imagine if the Secretary of Transportation of the United States didn’t have to defend his boss’ crazy ideas about water pressure and dishwashers, and instead could address plane safety at National Airport.
Just saying.
Any Republican who says the vote they just took on the budget won't cut Medicaid to pay for a $7 trillion tax cut for billionaires like Elon Musk is lying to their constituents.
Nearly every House Republican just voted to make Americans pay higher overdraft fees.
3. Military services papers (not a military ID alone) with sensitive info
I’ll be blunt. This is a modern-day Jim Crow bill that restricts access to the ballot box.
Under Republicans’ SAVE Act, your driver’s license won’t be enough to vote.
You’ll need:
1. A passport, which more than half of Americans don’t have and costs at least $130
OR
2. A birth certificate with your current legal name, which nearly 70 million married women lack
OR
House Republicans are forcing a vote to roll back caps on overdraft fees. Who the hell is asking for this?
Elon needs to answer to Congress.
It’s literally in Article 1 of the Constitution! Only Congress has the power to determine spending, not Elon Musk’s DOGE. I led a letter with 55 of my colleagues asking Speaker Johnson to do his job and bring Elon Musk in to speak directly to Members and answer our questions.
This week, Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the Pentagon is planning for a $1 trillion defense budget. That’s 1,000 billions!
Our guest, Bill Hartung of the Quincy Institute is an expert on military spending. He’ll unpack how it got this big and what we can do about it.
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
People are pissed and feeling unheard. The 10 point Supreme Court win in a purple state was an overwhelming rebuke of the Trump/Musk agenda.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.