Armand LaMontagne is an RI art legend whose portraits & sculptures brought so many iconic Americans to life for displays across RI & the nation. Saddened to hear of his passing & keeping the LaMontagne family in my thoughts. www.providencejournal.com/obituaries/p...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 188 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I welcome the White House decision to restore aid & intelligence to Ukraine. I urge the Administration to do so immediately before another Ukrainian life is lost & to explain the conditions of the ceasefire, including how they intend to hold Russia to account for any violations.
President Trump’s tariff salvos, unsteady leadership, & chaotic economic approach is increasing prices, downgrading the entire U.S. economy, & costing Americans in all 50 states. He must change course.
You ever meet someone who says they can help with a home project but when they come over to help they just screw everything up even more?
Ladies and gentlemen, that’s President Trump.
Trump Admin chaos has engulfed the National Fire Academy which firefighters rely on to prepare for emergencies & receive advanced training that helps keep them safe.
Pres. Trump is again choosing chaos over public safety by denying firefighters tools and training they need.
Congrats to Cumberland for raising the student achievement bar! We should be supporting students, empowering teachers and funding education, not trying to abolish the Department of Education.
rhodeislandcurrent.com/2025/03/10/h...
Cutting-edge VA research is being threatened by Trump Admin cuts, jeopardizing health of America’s veterans & holding scientific discovery back.
Veterans, working families, & U.S. taxpayers are paying the price for Elon’s wasteful DOGE & pony show.
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/09/u...
Even Trump’s former VA Secretary admits Trump isn’t trying to slash his way to a better VA.
The cuts to veterans health & services are to fund a bigger tax cut for billionaires.
thehill.com/policy/defen...
Getting a real person on the other end of the phone when you have questions or need help with @SocialSecurity benefits is essential.
Trump & Musk disagree. Their cuts have already impacted benefits.
Trump & Elon already fired thousands of veterans working in the fed gov’t. Now, a senior White House aid says some veterans are “not fit to have a job right now’ while Musk & DOGE put the VA in their crosshairs. Trump needs to rehire veterans & drop the VA cuts.
Took to the Senate floor to stand up for American consumers & strongly oppose GOP efforts to nullify CFPB protections that ensure consumers are reimbursed when they’re cheated out of their money on payment apps.
youtube.com/shorts/BtU0p...
I champion LIHEAP funding in the Senate because it is a lifeline that helps vulnerable RIers stay safe & lower their home energy costs. Grateful to the team at Westbay CAP for delivering critical LIHEAP assistance & more to those in Kent County.
“In chaotic political times, when our health and spirits feel low, a long walk may be just the restorative medicine we need.”
Great piece by @carlosrmunoz.bsky.social @globeri.bsky.social celebrating RI history & retracing Henry David Thoreau’s steps through Providence.
Trump’s speech fell flat because his rhetoric didn’t meet reality. The economy is backsliding because of his chaotic mismanagement. He needs to change course, stop mass-layoffs, tariff threats & billionaire-first tax giveaways & start working to strengthen the middle-class & lower prices.
After Elon's performative DOGE antics and Pres. Trump's gaslighting about so-called savings, the fact is: Federal spending has actually gone up since Trump’s inauguration and DOGE hasn't actually saved $$$.
newrepublic.com/post/192036/...
Consumers, business owners, retailers, & manufacturers are concerned about the negative impacts Trump’s reckless tariffs are having on their businesses & finances.
RIers: Make your voices heard by sharing what higher tariff taxes mean to you.
Special thanks to the team from East Greenwich’s Dewetron who are working on NASA’s Artemis mission for their out-of-this-world Rhode Island flag that traveled to space aboard the Artemis I flight!
As Russia, China, North Korea, & Iran work together, Trump is isolating America in an increasingly perilous moment in history.
My joint statement w/ Congressional National Security Leaders:
Social Security isn’t a ‘Ponzi scheme.’ Every American pays in and earns their benefits. The real scam is multi-billionaires trying to steal your Social Security by belittling & dismantling it. We must strengthen & protect Social Security.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.