My office has helped thousands of Nevadans navigate issues with the VA, Social Security payments, and other federal agencies.
If you need assistance, don’t hesitate to reach out. ⬇️
www.rosen.senate.gov/services/hel...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Jacky Rosen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes37%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align89%
Cross-party11%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 60 sponsored · 217 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This is outrageous.
At a time when Congressional Republicans are looking to cut Medicaid funding, the Supreme Court is enabling anti-choice extremists to further restrict women’s access to care.
Make no mistake: this will put women’s lives at risk.
Incredibly shortsighted announcement by Secretary Kennedy. Gavi’s work to vaccinate children around the world has saved millions of lives and helps protect ALL of us from the threat of another global pandemic.
This irresponsible mistrust of effective vaccines is dangerous and deadly.
Congressional Republicans’ Big Beautiful Betrayal of working families is going to give MORE tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy.
Meanwhile, the families who need relief the most will lose access to Medicaid and SNAP.
This bad bill will make billionaires richer at the expense of hardworking Nevadans.
Rural hospitals rely on Medicaid funding to provide essential services, often in communities with no other health care options.
Congressional Republicans’ cruel cuts to Medicaid could force hundreds of hospitals to close – all to pay for more billionaire tax breaks.
Even House Republicans who voted for the biggest Medicaid cut in our nation’s history think that the Senate bill goes too far in taking away Americans’ access to health care.
Saying they’re against it won’t cut it. Congressional Republicans need to stand up and vote against this bad bill.
We’ll keep fighting back against extreme efforts to take away women’s right to make their own health care decisions. (2/2)
The fight for reproductive freedom is not over. On the anniversary of Roe being overturned, I’m proud to help introduce the Women’s Health Protection Act to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade. (1/2)
Extreme abortion bans put women’s lives at risk. I won’t stop fighting to restore Roe & protect reproductive rights in federal law. (2/2)
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade three years ago, we’ve seen intensifying attacks on women’s reproductive freedom across the country causing irreparable harm & even death. (1/2)
Veterans’ education benefits are part of our promise to those who have served and sacrificed for our nation. I'm demanding answers from the Trump Administration about how their budget and staffing cuts at the VA and Dept. of Ed will impact programs that veterans rely on to build their futures.
Trump continues attacking law-abiding immigrants. Now, he’s coming after the Temporary Protected Status program – a lifeline for many NV families.
We must fight back & keep families together. Proud to help introduce a bill to provide TPS recipients with a path to permanent residency.
Trump’s tariff chaos is squeezing Nevadans from both sides – prices go up for families while tourism, an essential part of our economy, goes down.
I joined @jenrubin.bsky.social to talk about the pain Nevadans are feeling because of Trump’s reckless tariffs & what I’m doing to fight back.
Secretary Hegseth refused to say if he’s taking advice from a far-right conspiracy theorist regarding Department of Defense personnel matters.
That’s no way to lead the most powerful military in the world.
Apparently 16 million Americans losing Medicaid wasn’t enough for Senate Republicans – they’re going even further in their version of Trump’s “Big Beautiful” Betrayal.
All this to give more tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations.
Juneteenth honors a key turning point in our nation’s history, marking the end of slavery and the spread of emancipation.
Today, we’re reminded that freedom for everyone is always worth fighting for.
Pete Hegseth just confirmed what we’ve known all along: the Trump Administration is NOT serious about rooting out antisemitism in its own ranks.
Instead, he’s promoting staffers who spread neo-Nazi conspiracy theories.
It’s disgraceful, and he ought to be ashamed of himself.
I’m saddened to hear about the passing of former Chairman Arlan Melendez. As longtime Chairman of the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, he was dedicated to his community and a strong leader whom I had the pleasure of working closely with over the years. My thoughts are with his family and loved ones.
I’m deeply alarmed by reports that USPS could be going back on its promise to keep local mail processing in Northern NV.
I led the bipartisan push to prevent local letter mail from being processed in California, and I’m not going to allow D.C. bureaucrats to renege on their commitment to Nevadans.
I’m working to lower costs for Nevadans. Congressional Republicans are working overtime to give MORE tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy at the expense of working people. (2/2)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.