Brad Sherman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 32
Born
October 24, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-5911
Office
2365 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32

Brad Sherman

Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 32

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Brad Sherman headshot
Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Water rights along the Indus River was a major point of discussion during the meeting. China should not take any adverse actions towards India to restrict water in the region. India should not take any adverse actions towards Pakistan to restrict the Indus. 3/8
I urged the Pakistani delegation to relay to their government the need to free Dr. Shakil Afridi, who continues to languish in prison for helping the United States kill Osama Bin Laden. Freeing Dr. Afridi represents an important step in bringing closure for victims of 9/11. 2/8
Met with @bbhuttozardari.bsky.social, #Pakistan’s Ambassador Sheikh & House Foreign Affairs leadership for a candid conversation about regional tensions following last month’s India-Pakistan conflict, democracy in Pakistan, & counterterrorism in the region. 1/8
Grateful that the IDF was able to rescue the bodies of Israeli-American hostages Judi and Gad Haggai so that they may finally have a dignified burial. 1/2
The bodies of two Israeli-American hostages abducted by Hamas on October 7 were recovered from southern Gaza during a military operation, according to a statement from Israeli military and the Shin Bet security agency.
We also discussed the need to facilitate legitimate, Arab-led governance in Gaza, surge humanitarian aid, release the hostages, expand the Abraham Accords, and chart a path forward that brings greater security for both Israelis and Palestinians. 2/2
Great to meet today with the H.E. Ambassador Shaikh Abdulla Al Khalifa. #Bahrain is a critical U.S. partner and we will continue growing the ties between our nations - through the C-SIPA framework, our defense partnership, and more. 1/2
We will be hosting our next In-Person #TownHall on Saturday, June 28 at Canoga Park High School. This will be another opportunity for a productive discussion on the many critical issues we face, including our continued fight against #DonaldTrump's chaotic and costly agenda.
On May 21st, two Jews were shot dead in an antisemitic terror attack targeting an @ajcglobal.bsky.social event, where I had staff in attendance. I am urging President Trump to support funding for faith-based communities to put in place security measures that could have prevented this attack.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
615 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Passed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Agreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 13Next →