
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32
Brad Sherman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes40%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 32
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 117 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
#DonaldTrump tells us he’s deporting criminal aliens and gang members.
So why are they focusing on immigrants who have been paying their taxes?
apnews.com/article/irs-...
To assure yourself a seat, or to submit a question in advance, visit ⬇️
bradsherman.house.gov/Register
We will be hosting an In-Person #TownHall on Saturday, April 26, from 2:30 PM - 4:00 PM, at CSUN.
Join us to voice your thoughts on the many critical issues facing our country – including stopping #DonaldTrump's reckless and destructive agenda.
Today, House #Republicans will vote to take $6.1 billion a year out of Americans’ pockets by allowing the nation’s largest banks to keep charging excessive fees and to block any regulation of payment systems including #ElonMusk’s X Money.
What could go wrong?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXvD...
Congratulations to the #Dodgers for a historic season - looking forward to seeing you back next year! (2/2)
#LetsGoDodgers
I was so pleased to join my colleagues today to help welcome #Dodgers stars Will Smith and Tyler Glasnow to the Capitol!
I not only commend them for their historic win, but also for the work Will Smith and former Dodgers star Walker Buehler put in to raise money for victims of the wildfires. (1/2)
America’s voters did not vote for the craziness of the last few days. No one expected this when #Trump won the election on November 5th. The April response caused the stock market to plummet.
Trump should adopt policies consistent with what people thought they were voting for in 2024. (3/3)
Those tariffs were a reasonable response to #China’s market manipulation and remained in place in the last two years of his first term. These tariffs chiefly applied to China, and were so reasonable that they were continued with few changes during the Biden administration. (2/3)
#DonaldTrump has been yelling loudly about #tariffs for decades, but what did voters expect if they voted for Trump in 2024? They expected tariff policies like those that Trump adopted in his first term. (1/3)
Honored to stand with passionate advocates from
the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) and the Armenian Assembly of America to demand justice for the people of #Artsakh and a true, just peace in the South Caucasus. I will never waver in my fight for justice for the #Armenian people.
Register to attend ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/Register
Tickets will be sent to residents of the 32nd District who register. (2/2)
Our upcoming In-Person #TownHall will be on Saturday, April 26, from 2:30 PM - 4:00 PM, at CSUN.
This will be an opportunity for our community to discuss all the critical issues facing our country - including stopping #DonaldTrump's reckless and destructive agenda. (1/2)
This is a victory for democracy and the rule of law.
#SouthKorea
www.cnn.com/2025/04/03/a...
This will be an opportunity for our community to come together and discuss all the critical issues we face: our recovery from the #LosAngelesWildfires, #DonaldTrump and #ElonMusk's dismantling of critical services, the impact of Trump's escalating trade war and much more.
We'll be hosting an In-Person #TownHall for constituents of California's 32nd District on Saturday, April 26, from 2:30 PM - 4 PM, at California State University Northridge (CSUN)
Register to Attend ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/Register
Tickets will be sent to residents of CA-32 who register.
Under the #Trump administration's watch, Iran’s missile and enriched uranium stockpiles have grown.
Countering #Iran means doing more than just tough talk.
youtu.be/2f1c2FM69wU
As you can see in my remarks below, the closure of #USAID has already cost people their lives and will lead to millions of deaths abroad and the spread of the worst diseases here in the United States ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8Cy...
It is disgusting that the Republican leadership of the
House Foreign Affairs Committee would celebrate in the most immature way possible the closure of #USAID.
See my @ladailynews.bsky.social op-ed where I explained why #DonaldTrump's idea to abolish FEMA is an incredibly bad and offensive idea ⬇️
www.dailynews.com/2025/02/06/b...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.