I joined @ms.now this afternoon to discuss the strikes on boats in the Caribbean.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 9
Adam Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam Smith
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 9
SoupScore
Adam's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I joined @king5news.com.web.brid.gy to discuss the September 2nd attack on a boat in the Caribbean.
I joined @komo4.bsky.social to discuss the legality of boat strikes in the Caribbean.
A Fox News poll found that three in four respondents had a negative view of our economy. From everyday groceries to childcare to housing, costs are too high. We must pass legislation to rebuild our economy in a way that reduces the high cost of living.
Americans want to live in a constitutional republic, not an authoritarian dictatorship.
I will continue to support Attorney General Nick Brown and the 20 other states who are prioritizing Continuum of Care funds to provide housing to thousands around the country.
Not only is this unlawful, but it would severely harm Seattle and King County's homelessness response and dangerously cut Housing First support.
By shifting to short-term shelters, these Trump-backed policies would threaten the housing stability of about 170,000 people nationwide and risk up to $120 million annually for Washington state.
We need full transparency on expiring grants, staffing capacity, and obligation dates to prevent service interruptions and ensure continued support for the individuals who rely on permanent supportive housing.
HUD has released a long-delayed funding notice showing the largest funding gap in a decade, disrupting housing and services for 170,000 vulnerable Americans.
I recently signed on to two letters supporting Continuum of Care funding, which provides essential housing services to hundreds of thousands of people whom the Trump administration’s policies would leave at risk of homelessness.
My request for you is to watch this video so you can hear and fully understand the cadets' love of community and country.
God bless them.
Frank Luntz: The cadets at West Point live a life of commitment, courage, and character every single day. Today, on Thanksgiving, my gratitude goes out to them wherever they are.
x.com/frankluntz/s...
Happy Thanksgiving to all those celebrating across the Ninth District. I’m thankful to serve
your communities and hope you enjoy your day with loved ones.
King County has approved a new budget allocating more than $225 million for public safety and criminal justice, as well as over $55 million for housing and homelessness services. By providing more behavioral health programs and housing transition initiatives, we give our neighbors a better chance .
Seattle residents need to make over $135,00 a year to live a comfortable lifestyle, making our city the 6th most expensive in the nation. We need to bring down everyday costs, including rent, groceries, and energy to combat an unaffordable community.
@simonwdc.bsky.social
There's no such thing as a good totalitarian.
My constituent Sharon is concerned about the cost of housing. We spoke about increasing the supply in the housing market and my stance on Trump's proposed 50-year mortgage during my Virtual Town Hall on Saturday.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.