Reposted byRep. Brad Schneider
New Dem chair @repschneider.bsky.social on the impending rise of costs due to Trump's tariffs ⬇️
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 10
Bradley Scott Schneider
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 516
Yes44%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 10
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Bradley Scott Schneider
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 10
SoupScore
Bradley Scott's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 126 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A note to our community —
As President Trump addresses Congress tomorrow, he must face REAL Americans who are impacted by his actions. I'm proud to invite my constituent Adam Mulvey, a 20-year Army veteran, to the address.
Despite his service, he was fired by Musk on February 13.
www.chicagotribune.com/2025/02/28/t...
The start of March also means the start of Women’s History Month, where we take time to honor the achievements and contributions of the women who inspire us at home and around the world. The advocates, history makers, and boundary-breakers who have paved the way for a brighter future.
Ramadan is a sacred time for reflection and prayer. Ramadan Mubarak to all observing in the 10th district!
Reposted byRep. Brad Schneider
Egg prices are expected to go up over 40% during Trump's first year in office.
Source: www.ers.usda.gov/data-product...
Proud to introduce the New Dem vision for this Congress. Americans want Congress to deliver economic opportunity, healthy and safe communities, and strong national security. The New Dems are getting to work!
Every American wants an efficient, effective government—there’s work we can do to achieve that. But what DOGE is doing - taking a chainsaw to our federal workforce HURTS Americans. It makes us less safe, less healthy, and drains experienced workers who make the government serve YOU better.
Chaos on the House Floor this evening as Republicans flip-flop on voting on their budget that would gut Medicaid.
This should be an easy vote.
I joined every House Democrat to vote NO on their disgraceful budget. Here is my statement on this evening's vote.
The American people want Congress to make their lives at least a little bit easier. Republicans are trying to do the opposite.
Democrats’ priorities are:
☑️lowering costs for families
☑️access to affordable healthcare
☑️actually improving people’s lives
Because that’s what your family deserves.
Republicans just backed down from their morally bankrupt budget that would:
➡️be the largest Medicaid cut in US history
➡️tear support away from kids, seniors, people w/ disabilities
➡️make it harder for hungry families to get food assistance
➡️slash support for farmers
🚨RIGHT NOW Republicans trying to get the votes to pass the largest cut to Medicaid in US history.
I am a NO on the GOP budget.
This is the OPPOSITE of helping Americans get by and get ahead.
Disgraceful.
It's all in the headline 👇
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/u...
I joined House Dems on the steps of the Capitol to demand Republicans STOP their push to cut Medicaid. Thanks to everyone who has called my office to express your outrage about these efforts -- you are RIGHT to be outraged.
I will vote NO WAY on the GOP plan to gut Medicaid.
24,000 people who receive coverage under the Affordable Care Act would see their average premium go up by $960 per year — a 34% increase.
61,000 people in IL-10 who count on SNAP to put food on the table risk benefits being cut.
137,496 people on Medicaid are at risk of losing their health care under Republican budget plans.
This includes 66,790 children and 16,000 seniors over 65.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History516 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
516 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.