
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 5
Mary Gay Scanlon
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 336
Yes41%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Mary Gay Scanlon
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 5
SoupScore
Mary Gay's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 6 sponsored · 22 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
From the law's standpoint, the DOJ has missed the deadline.
Release the Epstein files.
The Senate needs to pass the 3-year extension of the ACA tax credits ASAP!
People's lives are on the line.
Punting the vote to the end of the month is unacceptable.
In PA-05, the Philip Jaisohn Memorial House in Media honors Dr. Philip Jaisohn, the first Korean individual to become an American citizen & one of the founders of the Republic of Korea.
Happy Korean American Day!
Today, we honor the contributions, history, & culture of our Korean American community.
Congress should be passing bills to repeal the Trump tariffs and make life more affordable for American families, not ones that actively sell out American workers to line the pockets of executives.
They took away your healthcare to give billionaires a tax cut.
They took away your SNAP benefits to give billionaires a tax cut.
Now, they're taking away your clean air so billionaires can make even more profit.
I stand with the brave Iranians protesting to demand a brighter future in the face of their government’s brutality.
The Iranian people deserve to make their voices heard without fear of violence, and the world is watching.
The federal government’s recklessness has spread fear across America, but the power of the people is still more than that of the people in power.
At the Delco Indivisible Vigil for Peace, I joined members of our community to condemn the lawless ICE operations across our country, including the tragic killing of Renee Good.
I joined 159 of my @housedemocrats.bsky.social colleagues to demand accountability for the killing of Renee Good.
The surge of ICE agents to Minneapolis must end, and there must be a third-party investigation of this tragic event to ensure transparency for the American people.
I joined 159 of my @HouseDemocrats colleagues to demand accountability for the killing of Renee Good.
The surge of ICE agents to Minneapolis must end, and there must be a third-party investigation of this tragic event to ensure transparency for the American people.
Congressional Republicans’ refusal to extend the ACA tax credit has already compromised access to healthcare for so many Pennsylvanians.
The Senate should pass the House's 3-year extension of the ACA tax credits ASAP!
penncapital-star.com/health-care/...
With everything that has happened this week, you know what didn’t happen?
The release of the Epstein files.
Americans were promised a "golden age."
Instead, this administration's disastrous policies are creating the worst job market for young people since the pandemic.
Even though @houserepublicans.bsky.social refused to extend the ACA tax credits, @housedemocrats.bsky.social got it to the floor and passed it today.
We can still make healthcare more affordable for millions of Americans.
Keep the pressure on!
Congress has to examine ICE's abuses, lack of training, and massive overspending immediately.
Instead of calling for an investigation or demanding accountability, the White House immediately tried to spin this tragedy by calling this young mother a domestic terrorist and claiming she had violently attacked ICE agents, despite eyewitness testimony and video footage.
A masked ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis.
This is wrong - and if you can’t see that, then you don't belong in Congress.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History336 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
336 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.