As Mayor and now in Congress, I have worked to prepare Arizona to use less Colorado River water through strong investments in conservation and water recycling in urban and rural areas alike.
...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Arizona District 4
Greg Stanton
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes47%
No50%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Stanton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratArizona District 4
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Arizona is now America's semiconductor capital.
Hundreds of chipmakers and suppliers operate in the Phoenix metro area, building the cutting-edge chips required for everything from consumer electronics to the defense systems flown from our military bases.
...
Making Arizona shoulder the burden of a shrinking Colorado River ignores our decades of leadership in water conservation, and it ignores our economic and national security importance.
...
Again and again, the federal government refuses to force the Upper Basin to put cuts on the table and entertains scenarios that would devastate Arizona.
It is a total failure of leadership.
...
Full statement copy:
Solving the Colorado River crisis for the long term demands a fair, workable, basin-wide solution where every state has skin in the game. What we got today is the opposite.
...
I’ll never stop fighting to protect Arizona’s water, our economy, and our future. My full statement on today's announcement is here.
We need to conserve the river, protect water levels, and boost funding for projects that reduce our reliance on it.
I’ll keep fighting to deliver on all that and more, because Arizona can't be forced to carry this alone.
President Trump, the Interior Department, and the Bureau of Reclamation need to work with us to build an effective 7-state agreement based on today's reality, not century-old politics.
That’s why I helped lead a bipartisan coalition with Rep. Dina Titus calling on congressional leaders to attach drought resilience funding to the next funding deal.
That is the bare minimum to help protect water access for the 40 million Americans who rely on the river.
Those investments are making a difference, but record heat and drought have left the Colorado River at its lowest levels on record
Congress needs to treat this like the emergency it is.
That’s why I helped secure $4 billion for Western drought relief in the Inflation Reduction Act, including $154 million for the SRP-CAP interconnect, $107 million for the Gila River Indian Community, and water purification for Phoenix and Tucson.
On top of that, I’ve fought to secure Tribal water settlements that bring certainty to our Native communities and downstream partners.
Every gallon recycled is one we don't need from the river — but there’s a long way to go before our communities can thrive without it.
I've secured tens of millions in federal funding for local water projects — treatment and conveyance in Chandler, smart meters to conserve supply, line replacements in Phoenix, and reopening Tempe's Kyrene Reclamation Facility.
This month, I secured another $151 million for the program in the bipartisan Water Resources Development Act, bringing the total over $400 million once it is signed into law.
Over a dozen AZEI projects are currently under construction.
In my first term in Congress, I created Arizona's Environmental Infrastructure Authority Program so our communities could build efficient and resilient water systems to reduce dependence on the river.
I worked to conserve our water usage as Mayor, and I’ve continued to protect the river and defend our water rights in Washington.
Arizona has done the work. We use less water today than we did 50 years ago, even after decades of incredible growth. We recycle more water than almost anyone. We made hard cuts early, before anyone forced us to.
We warned what deep cuts would mean for communities down river, including for Tribes, for our farms, and for our chip industry.
We saw this coming. Back in March, I led Arizona's congressional Democrats in telling the Bureau of Reclamation that none of the alternatives in their draft plan were workable for our state.
The new federal framework for Colorado River operations fails to recognize today's reality.
The river is in crisis, and AZ has the most to lose. No state has done more to prepare for difficult years ahead than ours. Here's the record the Interior Dept. left out and what Congress needs to do.
🧵
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 1993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 1003 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 2393 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 5317 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 4544 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 3234 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1299 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 5625 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H. Con. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1259 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1251 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 96 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1252 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-12 | H.R. 2853 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-12 | H.R. 2071 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. 4465 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | S. 1318 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 227 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 7959 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-23 | H.R. 5587 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.