Donald Trump and his Administration continue to stonewall the federal courts and playing games with the due process rights of many.
This is not leadership. Disregarding a lawful Supreme Court ruling is an impeachable offense. Plain and simple.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Michigan District 13
Shri Thanedar
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 616
Yes44%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 13
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Shri Thanedar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMichigan District 13
SoupScore
Shri's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 425 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Happy Easter, Michigan! May this day bring joy, renewal, and togetherness to you and your loved ones. Wishing everyone a safe and blessed holiday. 🌷 #EasterSunday #Michigan
The United States Supreme Court blocked the Trump Administration from taking unlawful action. Again.
The courts are holding this Administration accountable. If the Administration defies the Court again, then Congress must take action.
Republicans are upset that I have called for the impeachment of Donald Trump.
The reason why is simple: a President cannot disregard a lawful Supreme Court order and not face accountability.
Donald Trump's open defiance of a lawful Supreme Court order is an impeachable offense.
The House of Representatives should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President. The future of our nation depends on it.
I've seen enough. Donald Trump is not abiding by a lawful Supreme Court ruling. As a member of Congress, I fully support impeaching him. NOW.
Elon Musk and Donald Trump are gutting Social Security as we speak.
The danger to benefits for millions has never been so great.
Keep sounding the alarms. Keep fighting back. We cannot let it happen.
Yesterday, I voted NO on the SAVE Act and voted NO on the Republican budget plan that will gut Medicaid and food assistance in our nation.
We must protect our people and their rights.
I'm voting HELL NO on the Republican budget bill that will slash your Medicaid and food assistance benefits.
Tariffs are bad for everyone. I'm ready to vote on a bill to make sure Donald Trump's tariffs power is severely limited. We cannot let this go unchecked any longer.
Tanking the stock market is not good economic policy.
Democrats in Congress are ready to hold Trump accountable for harming everyday Americans.
Donald Trump's economic policy is reckless: plain and simple.
We need to lower costs on American families.
Right now, he is doing the opposite. House Democrats will work to hold him accountable.
Donald Trump is actively making it more expensive to live in America.
The market is falling, costs are rising, and our economy is in turmoil. It did not have to be this way.
Tariffs are terrible for autoworkers. It’s that simple.
Donald Trump's tariffs are bullshit. I'm fighting back in Congress. We won't let him get away with it.
Today may be April Fools Day, but there is nothing funny happening in our nation right now.
We need to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
We need to protect our people.
There’s no way in hell I would ever vote to cut Medicaid, Medicare, or Social Security—I will always protect your benefits. Full stop.
We need a Congressional investigation into the Signal group chat, and we need it now.
The American people deserve answers.
There’s no way in hell I'm defunding PBS or NPR.
Tariffs are not good for anyone—not good for Michigan and not good for America.
It’s that simple. www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcn...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History616 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
616 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.