5. Last but certainly not least, this bill is a BIG step to fight climate change.
It would lower power sector emissions, accelerate clean energy, and avoid emissions equivalent to those from nearly 35 million gasoline-powered vehicles.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Sheldon Whitehouse
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 915
Yes33%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sheldon Whitehouse
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Sheldon's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 103 sponsored · 279 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
4. Americans are feeling the squeeze on their utility bills and believe our bill is the solution. 79% of voters support BAAJA.
www.thirdway.org/memo/polling...
3. Unions support our bill because it would create 100,000+ well-paying jobs.
2. There is massive demand for more clean energy. This bill would bring it to the grid faster, significantly lowering families' energy costs and reducing pollution.
Plus, FAFO for clean energy. No administration would be able to systematically block clean energy projects.
1. This is the FIRST bill to rein in data centers.
It would save ratepayers $55 billion just by making data centers pay their fair share.
www.techtarget.com/news/data-ce...
Our permitting bill lowers energy costs and emissions, boosts clean energy, and creates good jobs.
There’s a lot to like about this bill.
🧵
Climate bipartisanship was killed by the fossil fuel industry, with dark money, thanks to Citizens United, to protect its free-to-pollute business model (now costing us all over $700 billion per year per IMF — an immense motive to corrupt).
The very cadence of Republican Senate campaign spending changed; by 2016, attack ad barrage started a full year before the election — a sign of unlimited money to spend. Bayh, Feingold, Strickland campaigns were strafed in the cradle; McConnell kept the majority.
The key moment was January 2010 when Citizens United opened spigots of fossil fuel money. Before: Cantwell/Collins, Warner(R)/Lieberman, Kerry/Graham, McCain presidential platform. After: crickets. A deal was cut to kill bipartisanship on climate for money.
skepticalscience.com/print.php?n=...
Canada should join rather than pay. PM Carney knows how important this is. The EU should be flexible about admitting Canada, close out admitting Australia, and start negotiating recognition with California.
www.cbc.ca/news/politic...
Americans want more affordable energy. Our bipartisan permitting reform bill gets it done.
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
“The IBEW strongly supports the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act... As the world’s largest energy union, I’m encouraged that the bill benefits our members that build, operate, and maintain the electric grid and the energy that powers it." bit.ly/3WvYtaT
Here’s some good news: Revolution Wind is officially fully up and running, ready to deliver clean, low-cost energy to New Englanders!
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
Elon Musk spent $400 million on the midterms only to be handed a stunning defeat.
Americans rejected an era of crony politics and corruption for a brighter future.
But we must pass reforms that crack down on this kind of unlimited political spending.
It’s a bright new morning in America.
You pay for their grotesque excess profits, from them gouging you at the pump. Trump helps them screw you by blockading low-cost clean energy.
Elections must be free, fair, and secure.
We got a serious briefing Sunday night on the Trump/MAGA schemes to cheat, and have made preparations so they don’t succeed at subverting our democracy.
Fall skies.
“Not only is reform needed to meet America’s soaring energy needs, but — contrary to the claims of its critics — it’s also essential to safeguard the nation’s natural resources.”
A cleaner, more affordable future awaits.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History915 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
915 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (47-41) |
| 2026-09-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 9340 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (57-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-30 | H.R. 7008 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-29 | S. Res. 852 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 852 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-51) |
| 2026-09-29 | S.J. Res. 197 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (77-22) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (42-54, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (1-94) |
| 2026-09-28 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (96-1) |
| 2026-09-24 | H. Con. Res. 89 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (77-23) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-09-22 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-22 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2026-09-17 | S. 4668 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22) |
| 2026-09-15 | S. 4668 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-09-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46) |
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 19Next →