Tariffs on China could work. Here’s how.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 4
Jake Auchincloss
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 499
Yes41%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jake Auchincloss
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 4
SoupScore
Jake's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 81 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
There was a tax & spending bill that could have been bipartisan. The GOP’s debt explosion & healthcare cuts are not it. Here’s what could have been.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw_W...
Watch the full interview here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3yh...
I sat down with Healthcare Trailblazers to discuss RFK, DOGE, and why efficiency in Gov’t is about return on investment, not one-time costs.
Why are Republicans afraid to call on Secretary Kennedy to testify to his committee of jurisdiction?
youtube.com/shorts/Dj8hQ...
Uncertainty is toxic for business.
youtu.be/kBn02aoQqSQ
America should aim to build five Hoover Dams’ worth of nuclear power by 2030. This will lower costs for Americans. The Dept of Energy needs better answers on how it will move fast to build more of this clean, reliable, and cheap energy.
youtube.com/shorts/lLT4b...
Reposted byRep. Jake Auchincloss
Auchincloss on Fox News: "What I'm seeing is a president who is more interested in the valuation of his memecoin than he is about people's 401ks. What I'm seeing is a president who along with Howard Lutnick is self-dealing on crypto instead of worrying about the strength of the US dollar."
Independent pharmacists are not only trusted medical providers. They are small business owners who are fixtures of Main Street. They are getting clobbered right now by the health insurance corporations, which are self-dealing and price gouging. Pharmacists are fighting back.
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), the middlemen of drug pricing, are just one example of the self-dealing and price-gouging of Fortune 50 health insurance corporations. My bipartisan legislation is the boldest federal bill yet introduced to rein in the PBMs.
Democrats must snap the chokepoints of corporate capture that are inflating healthcare prices, particularly by the health insurance industry.
youtu.be/WnmeDXBKAD0
MAGA Republicans are voting to add $6.9 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. There's no free lunch in fiscal policy. With higher taxes & inflation, we will all pay for that.
In a free country, politicians can’t appoint themselves judge, jury and executioner.
youtu.be/6eDXRo5dYXM
President John F. Kennedy said of Russia that we should not fear to negotiate. But we must never negotiate out of fear.
Now, Trump is negotiating with Putin out of fear. The Kremlin respects only strength.
The Chinese are building invasion barges for Taiwan.
Pete Hegseth is building a makeup studio.
youtu.be/GXHxHAVTk1k
Republicans will try to break Social Security so they can then claim it can only be fixed by privatizing it.
Democrats will stop them.
No one who stands on American soil should have their freedom taken away without due process.
"At the same time as [MAGA] is taking a good economy and shoving it over a cliff, they are also cutting the social safety net meant to protect people in a bad economy."
www.bostonglobe.com/2025/04/17/m...
The administration is attacking Social Security.
Democrats created Social Security and we will protect it.
youtube.com/shorts/Sj4uQ...
Universities, law firms, businesses, unions — leaders across industries must be in solidarity against Trump's lawlessness.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History499 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
499 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-21 | H. Con. Res. 58 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 1949 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.