KOSA is an idea whose time has come—in fact, it’s overdue—& even tech companies like X & Apple are realizing the status quo is unsustainable. Our coalition is bigger & stronger than ever, & we are committed to seeing this measure protecting kids on the internet signed into law.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Connecticut
Richard Blumenthal
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 830
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard Blumenthal
U.S. SenatorDemocratConnecticut
SoupScore
Richard's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 111 sponsored · 587 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I am grateful to Senators Thune & Schumer for their leadership & to our Senate colleagues for their overwhelming bipartisan support.
Sen. Blackburn & I made a promise to parents & young people when we started fighting for the Kids Online Safety Act—we will make this bill law. There’s undeniable awareness of the harms caused by Big Tech’s exploitive, addictive algorithms, & inescapable momentum for reform.
Trump ought to be coming to Congress if he wants to lift Syrian sanctions—& supporting Congress in imposing draconian Russian sanctions. On both, he’s squandering leverage.
Reposted byRichard Blumenthal
Yesterday, @blumenthal.senate.gov, joined by @whitehouse.senate.gov and @sanders.senate.gov, introduced a resolution authorizing Senate legal action to force Trump to comply with the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause:
To stop Donald Trump’s self-enriching lawless thuggery, & protect its own lawful powers, the Senate must invoke the Constitution through legal action in federal court. 1/ www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/pre...
Pratt workers are standing strong for fair pay, good pensions & job security— & I’m proud to stand with them. In East Hartford on Friday & Middletown yesterday, I’m inspired by these machinists & their union, the IAM.
I challenge Senate Republicans to prove that they are more than mere lackeys to President Trump’s self-enrichment schemes & show that the Senate still has a spine by joining this effort. 4
What the Framers never anticipated was the pathetic submission of Congress to the whims of a tyrant. I'm introducing this resolution to demand the Senate assert its authority & require Trump’s compliance w/the Constitution, & I’ll be calling for its passage on the Senate Floor 3/
Having just defeated exploitive colonial despots, & fearing foreign influence on home-grown tyrants, the Framers explicitly prohibited the corruption that is becoming Trump’s trademark—accepting luxury jets & potentially millions in crooked crypto payments. 2/
To stop Donald Trump’s self-enriching lawless thuggery, & protect its own lawful powers, the Senate must invoke the Constitution through legal action in federal court. 1/ www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/pre...
The start of summer weather serves as a stark reminder—look before you lock. It can take mere minutes on a hot day for a car to become a death trap for a child. These tragic deaths are preventable.
This gift walks, squawks, & looks like a corrupt duck. The founders’ core purpose in Constitutionally banning gifts from foreign powers to American officials was to prevent them from being beholden. Which is why this gift seems to clearly violate the Emoluments Clause.
Wishing a wonderful Mother’s Day to all the moms & mother figures. May you feel loved & thanked today & every day for all you do.
Totally untethered to reality, this idea would seem laughable in any other administration but it seems deadly serious now. Saying there may exist an “invasion” that justifies such an extreme measure is not kooky from this White House. It’s scary. It portends tyranny.
Highly important, impressive unity in support of a meaningful ceasefire, hopefully with Trump’s backing. Putin has earned scorching sanctions if he fails to agree, & our Sanctions Bill (more than 70 cosponsors, evenly bipartisan) should be passed to make the message real.
Firing CPSC Commissioners poses a threat to the health & safety of every American & continues this Admin’s attack of oversight. These firings are a partisan assault on an agency tasked with putting consumer safety before corporate profits. I’m demanding this decision be reversed.
I knew him as a former state AG who valued his relationships with former colleagues, & as a member of the Court when I argued cases there. His humility & personal warmth combined with his intellectual brilliance & bravery made him a truly inspiring figure.
In his deeply impactful insight & integrity, as well as dedication to the rule of law, former Supreme Court Justice David Souter was a quiet leader & mentor of unsung stature.
An exciting day for American Catholics & Catholics around the globe. As the world continues to face deepening & evolving challenges, may Pope Leo XIV use his voice to spread a message advancing peace & upholding human decency & dignity.
The $TRUMP coin sham is fueled by hype and grift. Big investors get Presidential favor, while small-time buyers’ bets go bust.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History830 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
830 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.