
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 31
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 552
Yes43%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 31
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 31
SoupScore
Gilbert Ray's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Shadow President Musk is so singularly focused on cracking down on non-existent fraud, he's actively harming Americans who rely on Social Security. He's creating a problem where there was none and it's at the expense of our seniors. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
There are more than a million union members in our federal government. I stand with my labor brothers and sisters against this blatant attack on workers and all working people. www.npr.org/2025/03/28/n...
Submit your entry to your school's art teacher. All entries must be received at my Covina District Office by Friday, April 11.
For a full list of rules and guidelines, visit: cisneros.house.gov/services/art-competition
Call (626) 646-0369 if you have questions.
Enter the Congressional Art Competition for a chance to fly to Washington, D.C., and have your artwork exhibited in the U.S. Capitol!
Mediums accepted:
Paintings
Drawings
Prints, including lithographs, silkscreen, and block prints
Collage
Mixed media
Computer generated art
This is on brand for Shadow President Elon as someone who only cares about enriching himself. www.latimes.com/business/sto...
And if that wasn't enough, they left their phone numbers and passwords available online, susceptible to hackers and foreign adversaries. This would be deeply embarrassing, if wasn't already a national security risk. www.spiegel.de/internationa...
Yet another example of Secretary Hegseth's and National Security Advisor Waltz's lack of judgement and disregard for national security. Every day they refuse to take accountability and resign is a disgrace. www.wired.com/story/michae...
Yet another example of Secretary Hegseth's and National Security Advisor Waltz's lack of judgement and disregard for national security. Every day they refuse to take accountability and resign is a disgrace. www.wired.com/story/michae...
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
HASC Dems are calling on Chairman Rogers to convene a hearing w/Sec Hegseth to testify about reports in The Atlantic that senior Trump officials conferred about a highly sensitive NatSec matter, including "precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing," on an open-source app.
People shouldn't be able to skirt gun safety laws when purchasing ghost gun kits. Glad the Supreme Court upheld this important Biden Administration measure that helps keep our communities safe.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...
Where is the integrity? They lied. This is not type of leadership we need at the top of the government. Secretary Hegseth and Director Waltz need to resign.
I'm curious how Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and Director Waltz will attempt to spin this instead of taking accountability and answer for their OpSec breach. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
Let's go @hascrepublicans get him in and show some accountability!
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
Democratic House Rep. Gil Cisneros says Pete Hegseth will eventually have to testify before the Armed Services Committee:
"If they think he's not going to get asked about this, they're not living in reality. He's gonna have to answer the call at some point, so why not do it now?"
Exactly!
Let's be clear, the "tax cuts" Trump wants to extend are tax breaks for big corporations and billionaires. The 15 largest corporate beneficiaries of the 2017 tax cuts saved a combined $97.5 billion over four years. How is that helping everyday Americans? substack.perfectunion.us/p/corporate-...
Sec. Hegseth and the Trump administration are actively jeopardizing our servicemembers and U.S. national security interests with their cavalier attitude towards operational security. There should be a full investigation.
And if those comments weren't evidence enough, Shadow President Musk and DOGE are making it crystal clear that they view Social Security as on the chopping block: www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
There are 125,156 people in the 31st district who receive Social Security. They deserve to live in dignity. Sec. Lutnick and the Trump administration are incapable of empathizing with the millions of Americans who have paid into the system and earned their benefits.
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
Today marks 15 years since Affordable Care Act was signed into law!
As we celebrate the ACA, it seems like a great day to share my first post on here looking back at some moments in its history to tell the story of how it happened.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History552 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
552 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.