Richard J. Durbin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
November 21, 1944
Age 81
Phone
(202) 224-2152
Office
711 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Richard J. Durbin

Richard Joseph Durbin is an American politician and attorney serving as the senior United States senator from the state of Illinois, a seat he has held since 1997. A member of the Democratic Party, Durbin is in his fifth Senate term and has served since 2005 as the Senate Democratic Whip and since 2025 as the Senate minority whip. He is the longest-serving Democratic whip since the position was established in 1913. Durbin chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee from 2021 to 2025, and led the Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nomination hearings.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes34%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Richard J. Durbin headshot
Richard J. Durbin
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Richard J.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 124 sponsored · 336 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

For more than a century, Rock Island Arsenal has kept our Armed Forces ready and safe. I led a bipartisan letter to the Senate and House Armed Services Committees urging them to support Rock Island Arsenal in the FY26 NDAA and ensure it remains a hub for manufacturing.
Nancy Pelosi’s legacy extends far beyond San Francisco. She was instrumental in passing the Affordable Care Act and helped rescue the nation from the depths of the 2008 financial crisis. She is an extraordinary public servant, and our nation owes her a debt of gratitude for all that she has done.
President Trump is willing to stretch and bend the law to implement sky-high tariffs that have hiked up prices for American families. But he refuses to use the authority two federal courts have said he has to fully pay out November SNAP benefits.
I’ve visited ICE detention facilities under both Republican and Democratic Administrations. But under the Trump Administration… I’ve been denied access FOUR TIMES. It’s terrifying to think what the Administration is trying to hide here.
Every Member of Congress has the right to visit an ICE facility. It’s part of the job. The Trump Administration is denying visits and it begs the question… WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? It’s unprecedented, unlawful, and unacceptable.
There’s a lot of news lately, but it’s worth repeating… There’s bipartisan opposition to President Trump’s reckless tariff scheme. Senate Democrats—with a handful of Republicans—voted *together* to terminate key tariffs he’d championed. Stop gambling with our economy.
President Trump is gambling with our economy when he declares “emergencies” and recklessly implements sky-high tariffs. The Supreme Court should rule in favor of consumers, workers, and small businesses.
President Trump spent his Halloween throwing a massive Great Gatsby themed party, while 42 million Americans spent their Halloween worrying whether they would be able to put food on the table.
Last month, President Trump launched a $40 billion bailout for Argentina, started construction on a new ballroom for himself, and bought two new private jets for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. But he did nothing to help Americans afford their groceries.
Drug trafficking has ravaged communities and should be prosecuted. But illegal strikes in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean put our troops in jeopardy. They’re not the answer. The Attorney General should reverse course.
What’s happening with ICE in Chicago is an OUTRAGE. I want to share a full explainer of the reality on the ground—even if it’s tough to see. Pay attention. Stand with innocent families. Watch.
I sent a letter a few weeks ago to major health insurance companies like Blue Cross Blue Shield and United to ask what it will mean in Illinois for the ACA enhanced premium tax credits tax credits to expire. Their answer? Devastation.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16