Richard J. Durbin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
November 21, 1944
Age 81
Phone
(202) 224-2152
Office
711 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Richard J. Durbin

Richard Joseph Durbin is an American politician and attorney serving as the senior United States senator from the state of Illinois, a seat he has held since 1997. A member of the Democratic Party, Durbin is in his fifth Senate term and has served since 2005 as the Senate Democratic Whip and since 2025 as the Senate minority whip. He is the longest-serving Democratic whip since the position was established in 1913. Durbin chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee from 2021 to 2025, and led the Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nomination hearings.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes34%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Richard J. Durbin headshot
Richard J. Durbin
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Richard J.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 127 sponsored · 341 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Donald Trump’s phony trade war with Canada took a bipartisan hit in the Senate with the passage of the Kaine resolution. Trump makes excuses for Putin and declares Canada our real enemy. It's MAGA madness.
Republicans are trying to rewrite January 6, 2021. It was a DIRECT attack on our country and our democracy. I’m announcing a spotlight hearing honoring law enforcement who protected us and condemning Trump’s pardon of insurrectionists.
Buckle your seat belts America. Trump launched a global trade war by declaring his national sales tax. This tariff boondoggle will cost the average American family thousands of dollars a year. That’s a lot of eggs.
Rob Karr, President and CEO of IRMA, explains how swipe fees are hurting small businesses and consumers in his recent op-ed. I’m glad to have his support, and I’ll continue to advocate for my Credit Card Competition Act to lower costs for small businesses and families.
Millions of households receive LIHEAP funding to pay for utility bills. I support this program because it keeps Illinoisans safe and warm. Now, the Trump Admin fired its ENTIRE staff—crippling its ability to help Americans. It's cruel and irresponsible.
Today, I attended the National Restaurant Association’s annual conference to speak on my bipartisan Credit Card Competition Act and meet with members of National Restaurant Association. Swipe fees are hurting our small businesses and consumers. We must pass legislation to protect them.
With President Trump’s tariffs, American families will see higher prices on groceries, cars, gas, and American jobs will suffer. Instead of lowering the cost of living, President Trump is raising it.
Our workforce needs my Keep STEM Talent Act with Senator Mike Rounds. It would: ADDRESS green card backlogs. PROTECT U.S. workers. PERMIT dual intent. IMPOSE rigorous vetting. Plus, it’s supported by unions and STEM leaders.
President Trump is risking a recession with this national sales tax he calls tariffs—while needlessly alienating our closest allies. When American families see the price of goods rising, it’s going to create a negative economic force across this country.
I just introduced a bill to streamline the path to stay in the United States for international graduates of our nation’s STEM programs. We need their talents. It’s commonsense, and it’s bipartisan.
The good news: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that FDA acted properly in rejecting fruit-, candy-, and dessert-flavored e-cigarettes popular with kids. The bad news: Trump and RFK Jr. reportedly fired most, if not all, of the FDA’s tobacco division yesterday.
I just pressed Republican and Democratic witnesses on nationwide injunctions. My conclusion: Nationwide injunctions DO have a role in our judicial system. ALL are entitled to protection in certain situations.
Tackling nationwide injunctions must be based on the merits—not just Donald Trump’s wishes. Any good-faith bill on nationwide injunctions must have an effective date of January 2029.
Proud to call Senator Booker a friend and colleague. He didn’t leave the Senate floor for over 24 hours to protest President Trump’s actions that are hurting American families.
Our country witnessed history today. @booker.senate.gov has broken the record for the longest time holding the Senate floor. He did it to give a voice to the working families who are being harmed by Donald Trump’s policies. Thank you, Senator Booker, for fighting for Americans.
Google has massive control over which websites we click on, ads we view, and businesses we interact with. Things have to change. We’re building a strong coalition to break Big Tech’s grip on Washington.
The Trump Administration sent a legal Maryland resident to their Salvadoran “MAGAprison.” An immigration judge already ruled that sending him to El Salvador would violate U.S. law because of harm he’d face there. Donald Trump put a legal resident DIRECTLY in harm’s way.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16