Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 3
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes60%
No38%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align79%
Cross-party21%
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 3
SoupScore
Marie Gluesenkamp's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We need real regulatory reform to be able to build effectively again.
I voted against a THUD funding bill in committee that fails to address the causes of our housing crisis.
This bill would also reduce investments in port infrastructure and MARAD, which could impact our local maritime economy.
I voted against an energy and water funding bill in committee, because we can't just focus on what we don't like – we need to work on building what we want.
The bill also results in higher energy bills for many and decreases funding for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects on our waterways.
This isn't a partisan issue, it's about accountability and not giving the powerful a free pass.
Release the files now.
The Majority couldn't decide what to do about the Epstein Files, so they sent Congress home early.
The Approps Committee called off too, meaning they conveniently won't vote tmw on my amendment requiring the files to be released to Congress. ⬇️
This bill gives servicemembers a 3.8% raise & includes $40B for military healthcare and $1B to fight drug trafficking, before these deadly substances reach SW WA.
I look forward to the Senate continuing to improve this bill to ensure the service and sacrifice of our servicemembers is fully honored.
One of Congress’s most important responsibilities is supporting those serving in our military & keeping them out of harm’s way.
I voted with my bipartisan colleagues in the House to pass a funding bill that extends support for our Armed Forces, without increases to our overall defense spending. ⬇️
I voted against a partisan recissions package to block funding previously approved by Congress.
Read my full statement:
I also voted for an amendment that would address timber staffing challenges in Washington and strengthen our military readiness.
Rebuilding rural economies matters way more to me than the amendment also renaming an opera house 2,800 miles away.
I just voted against an Interior funding bill in committee because it wasn't a good enough deal for SW Washington.
It slashes funding by 60%+ for clean water initiatives in our state and reduces resources for the agencies that maintain our public lands, monitor seismic activity, & run timber sales.
Congrats Brooklynn and Jace!
It takes incredible skill and tenacity to compete in rodeo – and I’m so glad y’all are representing our communities with pride!
Our communities are best served when skills are passed down and talented young people enter the trades.
Across Southwest Washington, students in SkillsUSA are showing off their gifts and taking pride in their craftsmanship.
Centralia is 150 years old!
We’ve got a lot to celebrate, and a lot to fight for, for years to come.
There’s a new sheriff in town.
Congrats, Roman, on being named Police Chief for a day, and thank you to all of our dedicated law enforcement officers in Centralia for making it happen.
I'm glad to see my colorful language come in handy.
Thank you to Rep. Amodei for his bipartisan support!
Thanks to Rep. Womack for his bipartisan support and not letting my amendment get left in the dark.
If the response from our colleagues is any indication, his puns might need a little bit of adjusting (not unlike misaligned headlights).
If there's one thing Democrats & Republicans agree on, it's that headlights are too damn bright.
Brightness doubled in the last decade, yet standards are from before I was born.
My amendment passed to find solutions bc it's not a binary choice between the light of 1,000 suns & driving in the dark.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.