Happy Father’s Day to my husband and best friend, Tom.
Ben, Meg, and I are so lucky to have you. I love you.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Margaret Wood Hassan
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes41%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align87%
Cross-party12%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Margaret Wood Hassan
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Margaret Wood's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 53 sponsored · 234 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Congratulations to Salem’s Caroline Harvey for being the number one pick in the Professional Women’s Hockey League Draft! Wishing you the best of luck this season!
This #Juneteenth I’m thinking of Ona Judge, who fled to New Hampshire 230 years ago after being enslaved at Mount Vernon.
Her story embodies the Live Free or Die spirit and serves as a powerful reminder that the work of equality remains unfinished.
www.wmur.com/article/mura...
The allegations against Corey Lewandowski point to an unacceptable pattern of corruption and self-dealing. American taxpayers deserve answers and accountability for his conduct at DHS.
That’s why I am launching an investigation into his actions while working for DHS.
Our government needs a comprehensive effort to combat scams. Americans deserve one clear place to report scams and find help.
Senator Rick Scott and I introduced legislation to create a ReportScams.Gov portal to do just that.
www.nbcnews.com/tech/securit...
It was great to join Granite Staters at last week's Experience New Hampshire event at the Capitol. New Hampshire’s businesses, communities, and people are what make our state so special – and worth fighting for every day.
Read the full Joint Economic Committee Minority report here: www.jec.senate.gov/public/index...
A new Joint Economic Committee Minority report finds that under President Trump, inflation has already cost families an additional $3,100.
Working families can’t afford to “love inflation” like Trump and his billionaire buddies -- they’re too busy paying for it.
Bad actors are already using the World Cup to scam consumers online. Be cautious when buying tickets or travel packages, avoid suspicious links, and double-check websites before sharing personal or financial information.
www.boston25news.com/news/local/2...
During a cost-of-living emergency for families and small businesses, Senate Republicans today — over bipartisan opposition — pushed through legislation that puts the interests of the President over the pocketbooks of the American people. My statement:
Happy 603 Day, New Hampshire! Today we celebrate the people, communities, and values that make the Granite State unlike anywhere else. I’m proud to call New Hampshire home.
Bill Pulte has zero qualifications to serve as Director of National Intelligence. He’s abused his current post to target the President's political opponents. Our national security is too important to put someone like Pulte in charge.
Housing, child care, and health care costs are soaring under President Trump. Too many young people can't buy a home and build a future in NH. The status quo just isn't working for families, and Congress must take action to deliver relief.
www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2026...
Great to visit the construction of new apartments in Manchester yesterday. As rents rise and the dream of homeownership becomes harder to reach, we need to build more housing that families can afford, and we need to do it fast.
Happy Mother’s Day to all moms in New Hampshire and across the country!
Absolutely outrageous. Censorship of science is bad for our health and fundamentally un-American.
www.nytimes.com/2026/05/05/u...
Doctors — not judges — should be the ones providing medical advice to women.
Mifepristone has been safely used for years. This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand.
In the dark of night and over bipartisan opposition, Senate Republicans advanced a partisan slush fund for ICE that gives the agency more money than ever before while doing nothing to rein in the agency’s increasing lawlessness.
Last week I met with representatives from state agencies and community groups about the concerns they have about the Administration’s recent announced changes to the U.S. Forest Service.
Thank you to everyone who is speaking up about how these changes hurt NH.
www.conwaydailysun.com/news/local/s...
Saddened to hear about the passing of Earl Sweeney, a leader in New Hampshire law enforcement for many years.
Earl was down to earth, smart, and kind, but he held firm when he needed to! He will be greatly missed.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.